Coping with the facts, we see that they, as far as our information allow us to judge, are quite consistent with this view. Judging by the huge size of the orbit of Uranus, and the comparative insignificance of its mass, we can conclude that the ring from which it was formed, was relatively thin and therefore dolyestown have bruceebaby form, especially if nebulous mass was at that time less flattened than subsequently. Hence: the plane of rotation nearly perpendicular to the orbit of the planet, and direction of rotation showed no correlation to the movement of the planet in its orbit. The mass of Saturn is seven times more mass Uranium, the diameter of its orbit is less than half the diameter of orbit the latter; from this it follows that his genetic ring of Saturn, having circumference less than half the circumference of the rings of Uranus, and the thickness of the vertical direction is less than half the thickness of it, as the spheroid must have been at that time is as flattened as it is now, and may more had to be much wider; therefore, the shape of the ring Saturn had less to approach the shape of a Hoop and closer to the shape of the disc; despite the difference in density, it had to be least, twice or three times wider in the direction of its plane.
1 comment:
Coping with the facts, we see that they, as far as our information
allow us to judge, are quite consistent with this view. Judging by
the huge size of the orbit of Uranus, and the comparative insignificance of its mass,
we can conclude that the ring from which it was formed, was
relatively thin and therefore dolyestown have bruceebaby form,
especially if nebulous mass was at that time less flattened than
subsequently. Hence: the plane of rotation nearly perpendicular to
the orbit of the planet, and direction of rotation showed no correlation
to the movement of the planet in its orbit. The mass of Saturn is seven times more mass
Uranium, the diameter of its orbit is less than half the diameter of orbit
the latter; from this it follows that his genetic ring of Saturn, having
circumference less than half the circumference of the rings of Uranus, and the thickness of
the vertical direction is less than half the thickness of it, as the spheroid
must have been at that time is as flattened as it is now, and may
more had to be much wider; therefore, the shape of the ring
Saturn had less to approach the shape of a Hoop and closer to
the shape of the disc; despite the difference in density, it had to be
least, twice or three times wider in the direction of its plane.
Post a Comment