Also it would be unreasonable to include them the origin of the volcanoes of the planets. Even if their mineral properties consistent with this origin, which often is not the case (because volcanoes do not spew iron), no planetary volcanoes could throw them with the speed which it is assumed are needed, and could not would withstand that huge pressure, which in this case is necessary just as the cardboard, the gun could not bear the force of rifle bullets But obviously, meteorites, despite the diversity of their mineralogical nature, in full agreement with the hypothesis of their origin from the bark the world, and what the force of the explosion of this planet could tell them and also falling stars required rate, is the conclusion of the fair. Known planetoids are not that other, as the same fragments of bark, only large size - from 200 to 12 miles in diameter, at the same time it should it would be discarded more pieces of bark, the size of which would decrease along with the increase in their numbers. If the masses who the days pass through the Earth's atmosphere and fall on its surface, there was really so, this process would explain to us and the origin of an infinite number of masses much smaller which are in the form of falling stars burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. Imagine to the extent possible, the process of the explosion. Imagine that the diameter of a disintegrated planet was 20 000 miles; that its solid crust was a thousand miles thickness of that crust there was a layer of molten metallic mass, which also had about a thousand miles in thickness, and that the rest of the space inside, with a diameter of 16 000 miles, was occupied by the mass of gases of the same density above the "critical point", we're pretochemical connection between them, caused a devastating explosion. The initial cracks in the bark had to be at a great distance from one another may be the average distance, equal to the thickness of the crust.
1 comment:
Also it would be unreasonable to include them
the origin of the volcanoes of the planets. Even if their mineral properties
consistent with this origin, which often is not the case (because
volcanoes do not spew iron), no planetary volcanoes could
throw them with the speed which it is assumed are needed, and could not
would withstand that huge pressure, which in this case is necessary
just as the cardboard, the gun could not bear the force of rifle bullets But
obviously, meteorites, despite the diversity of their mineralogical
nature, in full agreement with the hypothesis of their origin from the bark
the world, and what the force of the explosion of this planet could tell them and also
falling stars required rate, is the conclusion of the fair.
Known planetoids are not that other, as the same fragments of bark, only
large size - from 200 to 12 miles in diameter, at the same time it should
it would be discarded more pieces of bark, the size of which
would decrease along with the increase in their numbers. If the masses who
the days pass through the Earth's atmosphere and fall on its surface,
there was really so, this process would explain to us and
the origin of an infinite number of masses much smaller
which are in the form of falling stars burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. Imagine
to the extent possible, the process of the explosion.
Imagine that the diameter of a disintegrated planet was 20 000
miles; that its solid crust was a thousand miles thickness of that crust
there was a layer of molten metallic mass, which also had about a thousand
miles in thickness, and that the rest of the space inside, with a diameter of 16 000
miles, was occupied by the mass of gases of the same density above the "critical point",
we're pretochemical connection between them, caused
a devastating explosion. The initial cracks in the bark had to be
at a great distance from one another may be the average distance,
equal to the thickness of the crust.
Post a Comment