We have already seen that this view of the origin of comets is consistent with the the nature of their orbits; and the proof, the ensuing, much more serious than stated. Most cometary orbits are ranked to parabolic; commonly assume that comets are remote spaces and never returned. But do not mistakenly added their orbits to parabolic? Observations of the comet moving in extremely eccentric ellipse, is possible only when it is relatively close to perihelion, making it impossible to distinguish it orbit from a parabola. Obviously, it would be risky to classify it to the parabola only due to the fact that it is impossible to find in it the elements of the ellipse. Though the just-mentioned difficulty is an inevitable consequence the extreme eccentricity of the orbit, however, it is possible that comets have elliptical orbits. Although five or six of them considered to be hyperbolic, however, as I learned from a man pay special attention to comet, "this orbit has not been calculated nor for one well-observed comets." Therefore, it is highly possible that the essence of all the orbits ellipses. Ellipses and hyperbolas have an infinite variety of forms, but there is only one form of a parabola, or, more precisely, all parabolas are similar among themselves, while there are an infinite number distinguished from one another the ellipses and hyperbole. Consequently, all heading to the Sun from distant space must be accurate the amount of proper motion to describe a parabola; any other the number would give hyperbolas or ellipses. If there is no hyperbolic orbits, then the vast majority the likelihood is that all orbits are elliptical. They these would be, if the comet had above expected origin.
1 comment:
We have already seen that this view of the origin of comets is consistent with the
the nature of their orbits; and the proof, the ensuing, much
more serious than stated. Most cometary orbits are ranked to
parabolic; commonly assume that comets are remote
spaces and never returned. But do not mistakenly added
their orbits to parabolic? Observations of the comet moving in
extremely eccentric ellipse, is possible only when it
is relatively close to perihelion, making it impossible to distinguish it
orbit from a parabola. Obviously, it would be risky to classify it to the parabola
only due to the fact that it is impossible to find in it the elements of the ellipse. Though
the just-mentioned difficulty is an inevitable consequence
the extreme eccentricity of the orbit, however, it is possible that
comets have elliptical orbits. Although five or six of them
considered to be hyperbolic, however, as I learned from a man
pay special attention to comet, "this orbit has not been calculated nor
for one well-observed comets." Therefore, it is highly possible that
the essence of all the orbits ellipses. Ellipses and hyperbolas have an infinite variety of
forms, but there is only one form of a parabola, or, more precisely, all
parabolas are similar among themselves, while there are an infinite number
distinguished from one another the ellipses and hyperbole. Consequently, all
heading to the Sun from distant space must be accurate
the amount of proper motion to describe a parabola; any other
the number would give hyperbolas or ellipses. If there is no hyperbolic orbits, then
the vast majority the likelihood is that all orbits are elliptical. They
these would be, if the comet had above expected
origin.
Post a Comment