Thus, even if we had little direct evidence speaking in favor of the hypothesis of foggy masses, the likelihood that it is true after all it would be great. Her own high birth and low origin the opposite hypothesis would give together sufficient reason for its adoption, at least preliminary. But direct evidence in favor of the hypothesis misty masses is not enough. They are much more numerous and diverse than commonly suppose. A lot was said about this or that category of those evidence, but nowhere far as we know, was not given wholly all proof. We expect to fill up in part this defect, in the confidence, in connection with the conclusion a priori we set out above, a number conclusions a posteriori, will leave little doubt in the mind of every unbiased researcher.
1 comment:
Thus, even if we had little direct evidence
speaking in favor of the hypothesis of foggy masses, the likelihood that it is true after all
it would be great. Her own high birth and low origin
the opposite hypothesis would give together sufficient reason for its adoption,
at least preliminary. But direct evidence in favor of the hypothesis
misty masses is not enough. They are much more numerous and diverse than
commonly suppose. A lot was said about this or that category of those
evidence, but nowhere far as we know, was not given wholly all
proof. We expect to fill up in part this defect, in the
confidence, in connection with the conclusion a priori we set out above, a number
conclusions a posteriori, will leave little doubt in the mind of every
unbiased researcher.
Post a Comment