We have to conclude further that the state of consciousness that motivate the bird to fly away at the sight man, there is nothing like the mental reproduction of those painful impressions which before followed man's approach; that such playing becomes livelier and stronger as increases number of painful experiences - direct or sympathetic, and that finally, arising in this case, the emotion is not that other, as a set revived, so to speak, of the suffering experienced before. If after several generations of young birds is known to breed are beginning to discover the fear of man before than he will harm them, then it inevitably follows the conclusion that the nervous system of the breed organically evolved due to life experiences; we must involuntarily conclude that if a young bird flies away from the person she is doing this because the impression produced on its senses by the approaching man generates by zacatecano-reflective actions of the private excitement of all those nerves, what, under similar conditions, was excited in bird ancestors. Followed to conclude, what is the private arousal is accompanied by a well-known painful consciousness, and a painful consciousness thus arising, and is itself an emotion, i.e. an emotion, a non-specific the data of experience and, therefore, appears to be homogeneous. If this is the explanation of the fact in this case, it takes place in all cases. If the emotion occurs in a similar way here, and everywhere she occurs as well. We are compelled to conclude that the modification of emotions discover different Nations, and those higher emotions, how civilized man differs from the savage, should be explained on the basis of the same the principle. But such a conclusion will inevitably lead to the assumption, all emotions ever happened the same way.
1 comment:
We have
to conclude further that the state of consciousness that motivate the bird to fly away at the sight
man, there is nothing like the mental reproduction of those painful
impressions which before followed man's approach; that such
playing becomes livelier and stronger as increases
number of painful experiences - direct or sympathetic, and that
finally, arising in this case, the emotion is not that other, as a set
revived, so to speak, of the suffering experienced before. If after
several generations of young birds is known to breed are beginning to discover
the fear of man before than he will harm them, then it
inevitably follows the conclusion that the nervous system of the breed organically
evolved due to life experiences; we must involuntarily conclude that
if a young bird flies away from the person she is doing this because
the impression produced on its senses by the approaching man generates
by zacatecano-reflective actions of the private excitement of all those nerves,
what, under similar conditions, was excited in bird ancestors. Followed
to conclude, what is the private arousal is accompanied by a well-known
painful consciousness, and a painful consciousness thus arising, and
is itself an emotion, i.e. an emotion, a non-specific
the data of experience and, therefore, appears to be homogeneous.
If this is the explanation of the fact in this case, it takes place in
all cases. If the emotion occurs in a similar way here, and everywhere she
occurs as well. We are compelled to conclude that the modification of emotions
discover different Nations, and those higher emotions, how civilized
man differs from the savage, should be explained on the basis of the same
the principle. But such a conclusion will inevitably lead to the assumption,
all emotions ever happened the same way.
Post a Comment