Now, if "the red Greyhound" was the nickname of a man, very a quick on the run (the famous walkers, and we have sometimes received the nickname "greyhounds"), then the legend of this kind could be natural way. And after a metaphorical name was mixed in with the real name could appear as a result of breeding a cult in the complex the figures corresponding to the rooted tradition. We have nothing to wonder this case that we find among the Egyptians the goddess Pasht, representing a a woman with a lion's head, or God har-Hat as a man with the head Falcon. Babylonian gods, in the form of a human figure with a lion tail in the form of a human bust to a fish's body, not seem more such incomprehensible images. We obtain satisfactory explanation and regarding sculptures representing sphinxes, winged bulls with human heads, etc.; and the legends about the centaurs, satires, etc. All the ancient myths often become the point now, it is highly unlikely to the one which was given to them by comparative mythology. Although these last maybe partly right, but if the previous arguments have force, then it if mythology right in their basic views. In fact, putting the facts in reverse order and assuming a secondary or subordinate elements which, according to them, of major importance, and a priority - those that considered them for the later insertion, I assume we'll be much closer to the truth.
1 comment:
Now, if "the red Greyhound" was the nickname of a man, very
a quick on the run (the famous walkers, and we have sometimes received the nickname
"greyhounds"), then the legend of this kind could be natural
way. And after a metaphorical name was mixed in with the real
name could appear as a result of breeding a cult in the complex
the figures corresponding to the rooted tradition. We have nothing to wonder
this case that we find among the Egyptians the goddess Pasht, representing a
a woman with a lion's head, or God har-Hat as a man with the head
Falcon. Babylonian gods, in the form of a human figure with a lion tail
in the form of a human bust to a fish's body, not seem more
such incomprehensible images. We obtain satisfactory explanation and
regarding sculptures representing sphinxes, winged
bulls with human heads, etc.; and the legends about
the centaurs, satires, etc.
All the ancient myths often become the point now, it is highly unlikely
to the one which was given to them by comparative mythology. Although these last
maybe partly right, but if the previous arguments have force, then it
if mythology right in their basic views. In fact, putting the facts in
reverse order and assuming a secondary or subordinate elements
which, according to them, of major importance, and a priority - those that
considered them for the later insertion, I assume we'll be much closer to
the truth.
Post a Comment