Note then that in that, and the other in the case of spetsializirovany first, it is not complete and becomes better with the improvement organization. We saw that in primitive tribes, like the most simple animals, there are still a lot of commonality between sending parts of the nominally different; that, for example, the leaders of the tribe industrialized remain for a long time equal the lower classes, just as in Hydra the ability to shrink have one endoderm's along with the units ectoderm's. We also pointed out that inasmuch as the society progressed forward, in two main initial classes were all less than and less common. Here we note that all further the first spetsializirovany highly uncertain, and only gradually out. "In the infancy of society, says Guizot, all redone and wrong; yet constant and precise line of demarcation between the various authorities in the state." - "Originally, the kings lived, like other landowners with income from their private estates." Nobles was a little sovereigns; sovereigns - the most powerful nobles. The bishops were feudal owners and military leaders. The right to mint the coin powerful subjects, and the Church enjoyed along with the king. Each of the leading persons at the same time corrected the post landowner, farmer, soldier, statesman and judge. People subject to these entities were the soldiers, the farmers, depending on need. But the Church gradually lost its civil jurisdiction; the state power more and more restrict your control over religious training; the military caste absolutely segregated; crafts focused in the cities; spindles, scattered farms gave way the machines of the manufacturing districts. In any progress is not only the transition from homogeneous to heterogeneous, but the transition from indeterminate to specific.
1 comment:
Note then that in that, and the other in the case of spetsializirovany
first, it is not complete and becomes better with the improvement
organization. We saw that in primitive tribes, like the most simple
animals, there are still a lot of commonality between sending parts of the nominally
different; that, for example, the leaders of the tribe industrialized
remain for a long time equal the lower classes, just as in Hydra
the ability to shrink have one endoderm's along with the units
ectoderm's. We also pointed out that inasmuch as the society progressed
forward, in two main initial classes were all less than
and less common. Here we note that all further
the first spetsializirovany highly uncertain, and only gradually
out. "In the infancy of society, says Guizot, all redone and
wrong; yet constant and precise line of demarcation between the various
authorities in the state." - "Originally, the kings lived, like other
landowners with income from their private estates." Nobles
was a little sovereigns; sovereigns - the most powerful nobles.
The bishops were feudal owners and military leaders. The right to mint
the coin powerful subjects, and the Church enjoyed along with the king.
Each of the leading persons at the same time corrected the post
landowner, farmer, soldier, statesman and judge.
People subject to these entities were the soldiers, the farmers, depending on
need. But the Church gradually lost its civil jurisdiction;
the state power more and more restrict your control over
religious training; the military caste absolutely segregated; crafts
focused in the cities; spindles, scattered farms gave way
the machines of the manufacturing districts. In any progress is not only
the transition from homogeneous to heterogeneous, but the transition from indeterminate to
specific.
Post a Comment