Reading it Guide, you'd think he was of the opinion that the primary epoch ended, and the secondary started around the globe in one and the same time that these terms really correspond to sharply defined world periods in nature. So, he accepts that the division between kampinski and the lower Silurian system in America corresponds to chronologically to the division between kampinski and the lower Silurian system in Wallis, he considers it unquestionable, that the boundaries separating the lower Silurian system from medium and medium from the top in the same location and concurrent with the same boundaries in other areas. Does it suggest that he believes geologic "systems" world in the sense that their separation from one another was everywhere at the same time? Although he, no doubt, be denied from this position, as the dogma of his beliefs, but does not affect whether it unconsciously to him on his thinking? Not whether we have a right to say that though hypothesis onion petals and died, but her spirit continues to live some the transcendent life in the reasoning of its opponents? Let us now consider the other main geological doctrine. We mean the doctrine that strata of the same antiquity and contain the same fossils and that, consequently, the antiquity and the relative position of any layer can be easily recognizable in it contained fossils. While the theory that strata, representing the same mineral characteristics, everything was settled at the same time, all clearly rejected, adopted the theory that in every geological the era of everywhere existed the same animals and plants and that consequently, the time in which the system can be easily recognizable contained in the formation of organic remains. Although, to be maybe none of the first-class geoscientists will not dare to protect this right theory without reservation, however she kind of implied in all walkers geological reasoning.
1 comment:
Reading it
Guide, you'd think he was of the opinion that
the primary epoch ended, and the secondary started around the globe in one
and the same time that these terms really correspond to sharply defined
world periods in nature. So, he accepts that the division between
kampinski and the lower Silurian system in America corresponds to
chronologically to the division between kampinski and the lower Silurian system in
Wallis, he considers it unquestionable, that the boundaries separating the lower Silurian
system from medium and medium from the top in the same location and concurrent with
the same boundaries in other areas. Does it suggest that
he believes geologic "systems" world in the sense that their separation
from one another was everywhere at the same time? Although he, no doubt, be denied
from this position, as the dogma of his beliefs, but does not affect whether it
unconsciously to him on his thinking? Not whether we have a right to say that though
hypothesis onion petals and died, but her spirit continues to live some
the transcendent life in the reasoning of its opponents?
Let us now consider the other main geological doctrine. We
mean the doctrine that strata of the same antiquity and contain
the same fossils and that, consequently, the antiquity and
the relative position of any layer can be easily recognizable in
it contained fossils. While the theory that strata,
representing the same mineral characteristics, everything was settled at the same time,
all clearly rejected, adopted the theory that in every geological
the era of everywhere existed the same animals and plants and that
consequently, the time in which the system can be easily
recognizable contained in the formation of organic remains. Although, to be
maybe none of the first-class geoscientists will not dare to protect this right
theory without reservation, however she kind of implied in all
walkers geological reasoning.
Post a Comment