Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
So, I think you can see that the difference between the views of Mr. Martino andthose to which he objected, not as great as he points out, and even Iit seems that the difference rather back the one that he sets. In short, the differencethat Martino admits the existence of mysteries where the doctrine which heprotects, does not recognize it. As for me, the meeting with Mr. Martinoour disagreement with the materialistic explanation of the extremely shallow,I differ from Mr. Martino is only that he thinks found anotherthe explanation of the phenomena, but I confess I can't find it. And while Martinohe thinks he can understand the power manifested in things, I feel compelledto admit, after many attempts, I can't understand it. So beforeabstract a problem posed by the universe, Martino believesthe human intellect is all-powerful, and I think him powerless. I think it's not the opposite view, as indicated by the articleMartino. If we talk about "pride of science", it obviously came frompride of theology. I don't see humility in the belief that the human mindable to understand that the above evidence; I do not see specialpiety in the assertion that in the Universe, in nature there is no other higherexistence, moreover, which we consider to be consciousness. On the contrary, II believe it is possible to defend the position that more humility isin recognition of his inability to grasp the idea cause of all things and thatthe religious sense will find the highest expression in the belief that a Higher Powerno more than can be presented in terms of human consciousness thanwithin the functions of plants.
Post a Comment