Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Pearl Necklace | Pearl Jewelry: The Beautiful Evolution of Wedding Dress StylesGoo...

Pearl Necklace | Pearl Jewelry: The Beautiful Evolution of Wedding Dress StylesGoo...: The Beautiful Evolution of  Wedding Dress  Styles GoodHousekeeping.com (blog) - Aug. 3, 2015 And to show us just how much, Fairmont ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

This reason is recognized by few, was doubtless correct, so
as, on the one hand, is not subject to question in the course of life
individual body a change in the functions of the body necessarily entails
a change in its structure, and on the other nothing prevents you to take
the hypothesis that changes of structure caused in this way can be
inherited. However, for open-minded thinkers, it was clear that this
the reason can not be reasonably applied to the explanation of most of the facts.
Although in plants there are changes that can be not without reason
assigned to the direct action of changed functions of the body.,
caused by modification of surrounding conditions, but most of the shit
organization plants are not amenable to such an explanation. It cannot be assumed,
that the thorns with which the plant is significant
fully protected from plucking the animals evolved and took its present
form due to prolonged execution of their protective functions
first, the vast majority of spikes never never been
the plucking, and, secondly, we have not the slightest reason to believe,
those of thorns, which osypalis, precisely because the latter was?! to grow
and took the form in which their function can best be
executed. Plants become inedible due to the thick woolly
the cover of their leaves, can develop their covers by progress
is a direct reaction to the actions of their enemies; the fact that
you can't come up with any rational explanation as to why one
part of the plants start to form on the surface of the hairs, if the other
part is eaten by animals. How a direct action function to
the structure may explain the appearance of the shell of the nut? How the actions of
birds could cause in the seeds of many plants the selection of fatty oils,
the purpose of which is to make seeds unpalatable to birds and
in order to protect them from vyklevyvanija? Or how to attribute
ambient conditions direct cause of some seeds
fine feathers, by which seeds can be portable blow
wind in distant places. It is clear that in these and countless other cases
the changes in the structure can not be directly caused by change of functions.
To the same extent this is also true regarding animals.