Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
cal speculation, metaphysical soaring in space and not connecteda living organic relationship with an existing phenomenon ideographs orthe symbol" (P. 103). On the other hand, such criticism is partially deprived of reason for thethe reason that theorists of symbolism were a different type of intellectual, isa writer, not a scientist, so naturally they have different requirementsto objectivity. The dictionary and the Preface lists all articlesseemed to its authors (and in addition to P. Florensky mentioned inthe quality and I. A. Larionov) in the form of descriptions of purely geometricimages. Dot, vertical line, oblique line, horizontal line...Yes, and the article itself is a "Point" is basically the look of the natural Sciences.Only on the last page occurs the aesthetic and psychologicalthe value of the point. Examples of the latter use is considered to be the following: "Brillianthypnotist bead of water reflecting the bright spot; all sortsdevices that have the task to nurture spontaneous concentrationattention; large and small dots, put on posters, advertisements, publications;fly as a matter of cosmetics, grain of beads and beads accounts etc. havepsychological feature to focus and to keep him focusedattention" (P. 113). P. Florensky concludes that consideration of the issuethe inexhaustible symbol of the impossibility of enumerating all of its aspects:"The symbol is not an abstract concept or some artifact in relation towho from us or from someone else depends on you to outline the exact boundaries andsome legislation to prevent the character to go fortheselimits. As a living spiritual education, a symbol of a United and determined in itself,but from the inside, not from outside. Only the study of actual casessinglevoltage gives you the opportunity to understand approximately the boundaries of the symbol,but only approximately" (P. 114). By the way, from these words it is clear that attention to the material aspectsymbol, which is not, for example, F. de Saussure. Florensky couldn'tto reiterate, following Saussure, that a chess game is still whatmade the figures of chess. He just lifts this material aspect,for him it ceases to be casual, getting, to a certain extentsystemic.
Post a Comment