Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The outcome of Andrey Bogolyubsky of Kiev, andnto tabletirovat from different points of view: governmtgovernmental, national, social, political, PSandhealth, personality, etc. and each such inteRPretoria maboutmay be quite possible and true. But if it turns out that the political interpretationandtion is contrary to the social, within neckonthe Torah General paradigm, it would mean that either both, ordon of them NeveRnye.So, Lev Gumilev, and not only he suggests that the Mongol invasion had a great impact on the historical destiny of Russia and the Russian people. Karamzin says that the invasion has left for many years a deep mark in the history of Russia and the Russian people. A thorough analysis of the history of Russia, its culture, politics, government, Russian language, conducted by the native historians, very convincingly suggests that the Mongol invasion left a tangible mark in the lives of the people. From here you can make the assumption that the interpretation of L. Gumilev is not entirely true.But this can be asserted only if we are aware of the problem, which was solved by this historian. In other words, the interpretation of L. Gumilev can be quite true, but only within the framework of its objectives.Recently, one modern historian, analyzing the history of education of Russia and Russian society came to the conclusion that actually the Russian as a nation and people do not exist, they were not. There is only a kind of the Cossacks, which are the strata of the Mongol or some other community. For proof selected series of very compelling historical facts. And all this in order to solve a special task of the _ origins of the modern Russian society are some of the modern peoples of Transcaucasia.Another historian, no less convincingly argued that the Mongol invasion did not, and was internecine civil war between Russian princes, etc. In the framework of solving specific tasks suchnthe interpretation of involved facts VPOlis not possible and completely true. To solve a different problem, nandexample for the proof of identity of the Russian onbproperty, this interpretation can be seen as loWtion. Series fKtov, also objectifiedeLenno andwithmuddy, letIthe et to identify andwiththinnest andnterpretivention to factwithrather make sureandtelsbut.Now let's not argue about which interpretation is absolutely true. It is not our task. But from a scientific point of view such an approach is unacceptable. Any, even the smallest nation, the nation wants to see itself great, though, in its history, and nobody has the right to her to refuse. Another thing, what purpose, what is the challenge of this nation, especially in interpreting facts and history of another nation. This goal may be in conflict with the aims and objectives of the other small, or large nation. Then the interpretation of their own and others ' history, it is not the abstract scientific character, and tragic political and practical. The interpretation of the facts often gives rise to an avalanche of interpretations the interpretation of the facts. Avalanche interpretation of the fact that ¡is a system of logical inferences, which are perceived as true.But there lies a fatal danger. A chain of logical reasoning has a special property: the more it unfolds and the farther away from the true initial of fact as true premise, the more (exponentially) increases the error and goes to the wrong knowledge. And in the end produces an absurd interpretation. We can observe the absurdity in tremleresearch Institute of the former republics of the Union to prove its independentandneed and identity, building a chain umosatoLuchini of specialandcially selected facts.Process inteRof prettie fact isaboutthe battle system laboutthe ecological umosatoLuchini, catonrye tandtoil aswithmuddy.
Post a Comment