"Humanism" of the Renaissance or "rationalism" of the classical era is quite could take to man a privileged place in the Universe to talk about the abstract nature of man, his soul and body, the problem of the races, the limits of human cognition, or the limits of his freedom, however, they are not could think of the person as it is given the modern era. The person is not arise in these systems because the location of his possible appearance offset by the smoothness of the mutual transitions between order of thought and order being. The continuity of these transitions was grounded on the universal language the classical era, stretching continuously across the field of being-cognition in its unity. It excluded the most important from the point of view of modern philosophy question -- the problem of the existence of consciousness and cognition. From the point of view modern episteme cognition is not pure knowing body as a finite man, limited in every historical epoch specific forms of the body, needs, language. The relationship of being and thinking in the classical episteme was carried out as if there were humans and didn't need it, and only the emergence of life, labor,language in their can not be reduced to mental representations of the specificity demanded the "appearance" of man to be exercised only in and through him. To man can approach, only knowing him a biological organism, manufactured items, the language in which he speaks. Thus between the ultimate human being and the ultimate content of life, work, language set against vzaimoponimanija: end Genesis starts here to justify itself, thereby abolishing the metaphysics of the infinite.
1 comment:
"Humanism" of the Renaissance or "rationalism" of the classical era is quite
could take to man a privileged place in the Universe to talk
about the abstract nature of man, his soul and body, the problem of the races,
the limits of human cognition, or the limits of his freedom, however, they are not
could think of the person as it is given the modern era. The person is not
arise in these systems because the location of his possible appearance
offset by the smoothness of the mutual transitions between order of thought and order
being. The continuity of these transitions was grounded on the universal language
the classical era, stretching continuously across the field of being-cognition
in its unity. It excluded the most important from the point of view of modern
philosophy question -- the problem of the existence of consciousness and cognition. From the point of view
modern episteme cognition is not pure knowing
body as a finite man, limited in every historical epoch
specific forms of the body, needs, language. The relationship of being and
thinking in the classical episteme was carried out as if there were humans and
didn't need it, and only the emergence of life, labor,language in their
can not be reduced to mental representations of the specificity demanded
the "appearance" of man to be exercised only in and through him. To
man can approach, only knowing him a biological organism,
manufactured items, the language in which he speaks. Thus between
the ultimate human being and the ultimate content of life, work, language
set against vzaimoponimanija: end Genesis starts here
to justify itself, thereby abolishing the metaphysics of the infinite.
Post a Comment