Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
It is clear, Thu sthis dual approval (either alternate or simultaneous)about ability and inability to formalize empirical shouldrecognize a trace of that profound event which, in the end of XVIII centurytorn space in the view from the very possibility of synthesis.This event will prevent the formalization or mathematization inthe basis of all modern scientific inquiry, and it also explainswhy every hasty mathematization or any naiveformalization of the empirical becomes "subcritical"dogmatism and sounds in thought as a return to the platitudes of Ideology. Ought to recall the other sign of modernepisteme. During the classical century, permanent anda fundamental classification of knowledge (even empirical) tothe universal mathesis justified continually and in a variety offorms of renewable project of building an integrated body of knowledge;this project gradually, although without changing itsjustification took the form of a General science of movement, theuniversal teachings on the signs, the language, sound andrestored in all its analytic values andsyntactic features, then, finally, a kind of Encyclopediaknowledge built in the alphabetical or systematic basis.No matter what all these attempts have not been completed, they are notfully implemented the project which has caused them to life: all of themrevealed on the visible surface of events or texts, the profoundunity that the classical age was approved on archaeologicalthe Foundation of the analysis of identities and differences and universal possibilitiesordering. So that Descartes, Leibniz, Diderot and d'alembert -- even inthat could be called their "defeat", thatinhibited or knocked out of the way of their work -- remains extremelysimilar to what was the basis of classical thinking. Startingsince the nineteenth century the unity of the mathesis is broken. Breaks it twice:first, the line that separates the pure forms of analysis fromlaws of synthesis, and then the line that separates in the justificationsyntheses of transcendental subjectivity from way of beingobjects.
Post a Comment