Friday, August 9, 2019

Story image for bridal jewelry from New York Post

Millennial brides say yes to unusual sparklers

New York Post-Nov. 10, 2017
“They have a strong sense that they want to define their own style,” says Greg Kwiat, CEO of the Kwiat jewelry house, which celebrates its 110th anniversary this ...
Story image for bridal jewelry from

The Top 7 Trends of Spring '18 Bridal Week 24, 2017
Bridal Week got underway with a sparkling Reem Acra show at Tiffany & Co., ... Monique Lhuillier and Lela Rose made the case for OTT jewelry, too: One of ...
Story image for bridal jewelry from Forbes

'Tis The Season For Jewelry Stores To Shine And Build Business For ...

Forbes-Nov. 19, 2017
December is the month when jewelry retailers can be expected to make .... offer wedding/bridal services, such as florists, reception venues, and bridal fashions.
Story image for bridal jewelry from Hollywood Reporter

Georgina Chapman's Marchesa Jewelry Dropped by Licensee After ...

Hollywood Reporter-Oct. 11, 2017
Georgina Chapman's Marchesa Jewelry Dropped by Licensee After Harvey ... their Marchesa and Marchesa Notte bridal lines at New York Bridal Fashion Week, ...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Let me remind you now that in any semiological system is postulated
the relationship between two elements: the signifier and the signified. This attitude
connects objects of a different order, and therefore it is the ratio of the
equivalence, not equality. It is necessary to warn that, contrary to
slovoto everyday consumption, when we simply say that the meaning
EXPRESSES the signified, in any semiological system has not two, but three
different elements, after all, what I directly perceive is not
a sequence of two elements, but the correlation which unites them.
Consequently, there is the signifier, the signified is the sign that represents
the result of the Association of the first two elements. For example, I take a bouquet of roses
decide what it will MEAN my feelings of love. Maybe this
we have only the signified, the roses and my feelings of love? No, it's not
so, in fact there were only roses, "burdened feeling." However
in the analysis we distinguish three elements: "burdened by a sense of" roses
every reason to be decomposed into roses and love, roses and
feelings existed separately before they unite and form
the third object that is familiar. If in my life I do not
able to separate the roses from what they report in terms of analysis, I do not
have the right mix roses as signifier and the roses as a sign; the signifier itself
yourself devoid of contents, the token is meaningful, it carries meaning. Take
some dark stone; I can make it anything meaningful to various
ways, yet it is means only; but if I give a stone
specific signified (for example, it would mean a death sentence if
secret ballot), as it becomes familiar. Of course, between the signifier,
the signified and the sign there are functional connections (as between part and whole),
so close that their analysis may seem futile enterprise, but
we will see that the distinction of these three elements has
of paramount importance for the study of myth as semiological system.