Morgan Stanley hired an AI expert from the fashion industry
eFinancialCareers-Feb. 5, 2018
Morgan Stanley's newest expert in AI and cloud engineering comes from the fashion industry. Santhosh Pasupuleti has just joined Morgan Stanley in New York ...
Stella McCartney: 'Only 1% of clothing is recycled. What are ...
The Guardian-Apr. 18, 2018
The designer's ethical stance made her a style outsider – but now the industry is finally catching up. Ahead of a new V&A show, she talks about reclaiming her ...
Fashion industry sets new guidelines urging designers, show ...
Daily Mail-Feb. 2, 2018
Fashion industry sets new guidelines urging designers, show producers and photographers to provide spaces 'where models can change in privacy' to fight ...
RiverBlue explores how the fashion industry is destroying our ...
Revelstoke Mountaineer-Jan. 31, 2018
Many Revelstoke residents are known for having both a unique fashion sense and a strong commitment to reducing their environmental footprint. On Thursday ...
1 comment:
In everyday speech, as already mentioned, in the living spoken language we do not formulate a series of possible answers. Questions were asked in an open form, but the answers, although not expressed explicitly, it is always implied. If we ask the interlocutor: "You go to the movies tonight?", we mean the possible answers: "Yes", "no", "don't know, maybe". If we ask: "What do You like?", so we assume that the items in question, he saw and knew.
Knowledge of possible options and nature of the response is determined by the entire context of the conversation the interlocutors or - more broadly - context nature of their communication.
In the artificial language, in particular in the sociological questionnaire, we have to ask a series of questions to determine the subject and content of the question.
And again we are faced with the rather complex phenomenon in sociology, and not only in sociology, when most of the questions can have various meaningful interpretation depending on the conditions of their presentation. So, the question "how do You spend your free time?" can be answered in different ways. The word "as" implies a variety of content and forms of spending free time (going to movies, played cards, read, etc.) or different levels of its quality: "I spend it very good, medium, bad, etc.", i.e. the word "like" can have a completely different aspect of the response. Since each survey question are presented as independent, is due to other issues (for the Respondent, of course), to the extent of interest to sociologist aspect, you need to determine what is being done through the proposed set of responses or, as we say among sociologists, by closing the question. For example the question is asked how respondents prefer to travel. One of the possible answers might include clarification of the preferred form of transport (train, boat, foot, etc.), the second option may disclose with whom the respondents prefer to travel (with family, with friends, alone, etc.), the third option of the answers suggests to figure out the kind of travel (as tourists, individually, in a group, etc.). In one of the forms on this question, the Respondent crossed out the proposed response options and added on the sidelines of his answer: "I prefer to travel?" - "In silence". This is also a possible answer in the context of reasoning. In order for the Respondent to understand in what aspect of the sociologist is interested in the content of the question should clearly state all the necessary series of possible answers.
Post a Comment