Saturday, January 11, 2020

Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from Pakistan Today

FPW'17 Day 1: Spring/Summer collections making waves in ...

Pakistan Today-Feb. 23, 2017
... 2017 at the 11th Fashion Pakistan Week at Pearl Continental Hotel in Karachi. ... her collection was all about floriography, used in the Victorian era to convey ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from The Guardian

Simone Rocha: 'With every show I'm telling a story'

The Guardian-Sep. 23, 2017
Girly motifs – pearls, flowers, tulle – are worked jarringly with Perspex or ... Ravaged hairstyles sit atop restrictive, embroidered Victorian dresses. ... She was a finalist for the LVMH Young Fashion Designer Prize in 2013 and has now won ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from Brownstoner

To Paint or Not to Paint the Original Woodwork? It Depends ...

Brownstoner-Nov. 7, 2017
Fashions come and go (such as the now-fading craze for covering everything ... she took great care to preserve the intricate detail and mother-of-pearl inlays. ... In the late Victorian era, the woodwork on the main levels of a brownstone was a ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from Christie's

Antenna: Back to the baroque

Christie's-Jun. 5, 2017
Their soft stones, set into exuberant ribbon-inspired designs, appear to strike a chord with contemporary fashion, which is becoming more elaborate and, dare I ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Yes, the world is constantly different, and if the consciousness tries to catch it at some point in time, it will never reach. But this is not necessary to do. The time to solve the man's problem is often enough to small constant changes did not affect his decision. In this regard object to at the time or, more precisely, during the time the solution of his task is constant. Permanent in the sense that the object retains all its essential characteristics or as we say, keeps the path of development. Changes its internal parts can be ignored, in any case, as long as they have not passed a quality overseas and do not have any impact on the main characteristics of the object itself. My Desk constantly wears out, i.e. changing, but these changes its internal parts are so slow that do not interfere with the solution to my problem, the preparation of this article and even another book. In this respect, my Desk is a constant, same as my perception of it. We can therefore say that the mind correctly reflects the object, truly, etc., and all the same object (table) variable. At some point in time it ceases to solve my problems: to become loose, SAG, crumble, etc. If time does not change the concept about this table, it appears that my idea was wrong. To identify changes to the object and use it to continue to solve their problems, it is necessary to closely monitor changes in its internal parts, in any case, the main. Thus, if a person will continue to adhere to old notions, he will not be able to solve their problems via this object, the trajectory of which will change the nature and content will be completely or mostly different. This is the case, when you say that consciousness does not accurately reflect the object that is untrue.
So, our view is conservative, but only with respect to the object, which are constantly changing, and the smaller these elements, the faster they change. It is important relative to the object, but only part of the solution to man's problem. It is clear that the period of existence of the object is related to the period of human decision its task. If the lifetime of the object is smaller than the solution time by a person of its tasks, then the object can not participate in solving this problem, and conversely, the longer the period of existence of the object, the more problems you can solve with its help. In this case we speak of the richness of the object.
It is necessary to distinguish between conceptual ideas about the world in General and conceptual ideas about their objects. Conceptual view should always be, but it does not have to be true, as in the case of large objects, such as understanding of the nature of the universe. Man should have and always has a General idea about the world and about yourself as part of the world, but this does not mean that it is true, as the person solves the problem not at the level of the universe, but only their particular problems. You can have an idea of what heaven crystal and there on the cloud settled, the Lord God, watching the world. It is a wrong idea absolutely no difference because people in heaven won't solve any of their problems. Just starting to solve their problems outside of the earth, he changed the concept of the crystal heaven. Private conceptual view may define a common conceptual representation, if the latter is not true, conversely, if it becomes relevant. Itself a shared conceptual understanding ¡it is a necessary final education in the common hierarchical pyramid of concepts.