Fashion icon Isaac Mizrahi: “Just because clothes are ...
WGN Radio-Sep. 27, 2017
Isaac talks about where the idea of doing a cabaret show comes from, why he followed a path in the fashion industry, how his best work is a melding of fashion ...
Crash course on Meghan Markle
CBS News-Nov. 30, 2017
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is an American-born actress and the wife of Prince Harry. On January 8, 2020, Meghan and Harry announced that they would be ...
Kendall Jenner and Gigi Hadid Don't Have That Supermodel ...
Vanity Fair-Sep. 9, 2016
If there is a single, surefire way to rile up fashion-industry veterans, it's to use the word “supermodel” in the same sentence as names like Kendall Jenner or Gigi ...
Tim Gunn: The Fashion Industry Is Not Making It Work For Plus ...
NPR-Sep. 14, 2016
Tim Gunn, Emmy-winning co-host of the show Project Runway, says the fashion industry is not making it work for plus-size women. In an article for The ...
1 comment:
Answering the question in a closed form, the Respondent is forced to work in the system of logical reasoning, which he offers to the researcher and which may coincide or not coincide with the system of logical reasoning of the Respondent. If you change the system of logical reasoning, naturally, is changing the significance of a phenomenon, often very significantly. In the open question sociologist receives information about the significance of a phenomenon within the logical reasoning of the Respondent that he "draws the situation." When closed the form of a question, as if he doesn't fully reflect the structure of preferences of the respondents (a total reflection is almost impossible to achieve due to the very nature of the closed question), sociologist receives information about the reaction of the respondents to our assumption, i.e., the Respondent agrees or not with the reasoning of the researcher. Agree that it can be quite different information. As in life, we can understand the other person and agree or disagree with him just in case, if you stand on his point of view, to accept his logic reasoning. But if we persistently stick to only their point of view and her perspective of what was discussed, then we will never understand the other person. At best we can agree on the fact that we have different points of view on the subject.
There are other reasons for information, the respondents ' answers can vary depending on the form of the question.
Post a Comment