Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
Answering the question in a closed form, the Respondent is forced to work in the system of logical reasoning, which he offers to the researcher and which may coincide or not coincide with the system of logical reasoning of the Respondent. If you change the system of logical reasoning, naturally, is changing the significance of a phenomenon, often very significantly. In the open question sociologist receives information about the significance of a phenomenon within the logical reasoning of the Respondent that he "draws the situation." When closed the form of a question, as if he doesn't fully reflect the structure of preferences of the respondents (a total reflection is almost impossible to achieve due to the very nature of the closed question), sociologist receives information about the reaction of the respondents to our assumption, i.e., the Respondent agrees or not with the reasoning of the researcher. Agree that it can be quite different information. As in life, we can understand the other person and agree or disagree with him just in case, if you stand on his point of view, to accept his logic reasoning. But if we persistently stick to only their point of view and her perspective of what was discussed, then we will never understand the other person. At best we can agree on the fact that we have different points of view on the subject.There are other reasons for information, the respondents ' answers can vary depending on the form of the question.
Post a Comment