Beyoncé's Stylist Is Giving Barbie A High-Fashion Makeover
Refinery29-Apr. 14, 2017
I had to wear a uniform my whole life, which was a nightmare for somebody ... Senofonte created a collection of remixed denim, Victorian looks reminiscent of ...
Kendall Jenner channels Marilyn Monroe for LOVE Magazine
Telegraph.co.uk-Mar. 27, 2017
She also wears lingerie by La Perla and Chanel pearl necklaces, in a modern ... show) she offered Kendall an opportunity to be seen as a fashion industry star.
Sparkle and shine
The Globe and Mail-Nov. 23, 2017
Right now, fashion is bright dress-up every single day, not just for special ... A year ago loafers with pearl-studded heels seemed outré. ... and Victorian-inspired pieces that can be converted and worn as hair combs, brooches and earrings.
Lyell, the Beloved New York Brand of the Aughts, Is Back
Vogue.com-Jul. 21, 2017
Some of them are well over a decade old and I still wear them. ... details (a keyhole neckline here, mother-of-pearl buttons tracing a shoulder line there), ... continued to pursue her Victorian-by-way-of-the-late-'70s aesthetic, Fletcher is reviving ...
1 comment:
Whatever activity the person was engaged, the resolution of this conflict is relatively simple. Always any community action mandatory fits into a more General attitude (action) system that performs a common task. The General problem, if it exists, is already speaking of the unity of place, time and action. And that it is subject to private or smaller level of generality of human actions. So, marriage for a man are a common problem, which solved particular problems. But this common task has its own large community, for example the continuation of the species upon which solved all actions including marriage, and marriage.
The person always operates to solve some tasks. But the activity is reduced to set of solved problems. No act is not possible if you have not made other necessary acts. In this regard, the activity is always considered as a process and a task ¡as a result of this process. At the same time, it is clear that any process contains a series of specially interconnected results. But because the result is either there or it is not, it turns out that the action is almost impossible, and hence impossible and the result. Here's a logical confusion arises on the basis of true premises.
In fact, no confusion there. People define names some phenomena depending on what task or part of it addresses this phenomenon. People have reported the activity as a process to describe a circle of accomplished results, which together give the desired result, which is called "task". It turns out that the task and the activity is almost the same thing, only called by different names. In fact, any activity can be carried out only if there is a decision of private tasks within this activity. But any activity can take place only in the framework of a more General attitude problem, which determines the nature, direction, and nature activities. It is a vicious logical circle.
The resolution of this logical contradiction is to change the content of the concept. What is called activity, is a kind of linearly arranged discrete set of particular actions having the nature of causal dependencies. But due to the fact that this path is discrete, it is possible to direct it in any direction. It is clear that in this task, all human actions are deterministic, i.e., subordinate to this task only. The external evaluation activities also take place only with respect to this problem.
Post a Comment