Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
In a closed question the set of alternatives already describes a large group of people, all those who have the reason for the dismissal may be low wages, and poor working conditions, and poor relations with boss, and poor social amenities. In this set, each group having only one cause of dismissal, may take a smaller place. In addition, respondents reading alternatives to a closed question, consciously or unconsciously, but they rank among themselves according to importance, and thereby also reduces the number of responses on the part of the alternatives. Accordingly, the percentage is set for each of the alternatives of the total number of respondents. Hence the least compared to the dichotomous question, the percentage distribution between alternatives of different forms of questions.In the table the question of his General social totality is more and more fractional. It includes all those who have one of the reasons for the departure from the firm. But along with this is the division of each of these subgroups a further three subgroups: those for which a particular cause is very meaningful, not very meaningful and not meaningful. In turn, each of these subgroups is divided, already a dichotomous question, for two equal or not equal to the subgroup who chose the alternative "Yes" or "no". Thus, the grid question are formed 4 x 3 x 3 x 2=24 subgroups. But since the response rate for each alternative table question is taken from the response to one of the sub-questions, as is usually done in a closed question, the number of groups actually depend only on the number of sub-questions and alternatives.Of course, the percentage distribution will be carried out by each of these groups, which consequently significantly reduces the percentage content of each of them. The ratio does not change when the counting is done of the total number of respondents to each of the subquestions. That's why it turns out that in the tabular matter, in our example, the average time for each alternative, answer a little more than one-fifth of respondents, if possible, answer each sub-question. But in the table the question inevitably occurs ranking of the questions between themselves, which is quite a difficult task.On the one hand, the Respondent must be attributed to some group, but, on the other hand, he is offered a series of questions, where it should rank in importance the proposed alternatives. In other words, in one case, it should work on a dichotomous question in the other - closed. The result of this contradiction, the part of the respondents, as already mentioned, refuse to wrestle with finding the right treatments answer and do not answer the table question.
Post a Comment