Saturday, January 11, 2020

Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from

The Best Hair Accessories From the Spring 2018 Runways 3, 2017
... and across the pond, Simone Rocha's cast of Victorian-esque Brits captured the hearts of It girls worldwide with their pearl-encrusted barrettes placed properly ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from WWD

Pre-Fall 2017 Trend: Modern Day Victorian

WWD-Jan. 4, 2017
Nicole Miller's stretch satin jumpsuit worn over a 3.1 Phillip Lim silk top, Pearl Collective earring and ring ... Dries Van Noten neckpiece; Pearl Collective earring.
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from

All the Sentimental Jewelry Prince William Has Given Kate ... 11, 2017
Kate owns a truly stunning Victorian eternity band made from garnets (her birthstone) and pearls (the birthstone of Prince William). ... Per a royal spokesman: "The wedding ring that Catherine Middleton will wear will be made of Welsh gold.
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from POPSUGAR

You'll Say "I Do" the Minute You See These Pearl ...

POPSUGAR-May 19, 2017
For brides on the hunt for a unique engagement ring, a plain ol' diamond solitaire won't do. That's where gemstones like rubies and sapphires come into play, ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Each actor sells primarily its own intereSy.
The subject simply cannot realize the interests of another subject, he can realize other's interests just as their own. In other words, only if the interests of the subjects match, then there is a realization of interests of each entity. The young man can not realize all interests of the girl when meeting, it may implement only that portion of its interests, which coincide with his interests, i.e. they are shared for everyone. So when the authorities say that they are first and foremost the public interest, the interests of the people, society or some social entities, they're just lying. They sell primarily their own interests and the public or, more precisely, the interests of other stakeholders, such as companies, pensioners, servicemen, etc., are implemented only if they at some point coincide with their interests. Otherwise it can not be, for each subject, it is necessary to say that again, can (and should) implement only their own interests.
And how those interests which do not coincide with the interests of power? There's only one way: the subjects of society and its individual social formations should not implement the interests of the government if they do not coincide with their interests. This means that the relationship between subjects such as society and government should be structured in such a way that the realization of common interests can be done only when are realized the interests of each of the interacting agents. In contrast to existing relationships when the government has the ability to subordinate their interests to the interests of other actors. Suffer and those and others, and all together lose.
Thus, the Soviet trade was not interested in serving the interests of the population, since it met their needs and thereby their interests in other ways. Suffered from this whole society, and may be because of this (at least as one of the dominant reasons) and there was a revolution in Russia in 1991. But as soon as the trade was set in such a relationship when she began to realize their interests through the implementation of the interests of the population and the whole society, all or almost all only benefit from this.
It was in this situation needs to be delivered and the subjects of power (officials, bureaucrats), and all the power. But this is a special issue that requires more attention, and which I hope very shortly to engage in the most direct way.