Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Story image for fashion industry from New York Times

Lucinda Chambers, Fired Vogue Director, Gives Fashion ...

New York Times-Jul. 4, 2017
After conceding that the fashion industry could “chew you up and spit you out,” Ms. Chambers went on to criticize some of the “crap” magazine cover shoots that ...
Story image for fashion industry from The Guardian

Sustainable style: will Gen Z help the fashion industry clean ...

The Guardian-Apr. 25, 2017
Unravelling and remaking the entire clothing industry seems a daunting if not impossible task, but there are signs that a younger generation of consumers will ...
Story image for fashion industry from

Christy Turlington: fashion industry is 'surrounded by predators' 18, 2017
Ms Russell's campaign, under the hashtag MyJobShouldNotIncludeAbuse, threatens to bring down major names in the fashion industry. All identities have been ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Now a long time can be regarded as a real constant time defined by the objects having the nature of perfect action and constantly existing a long time. "Do You have color TV at home?" In this case, the question is not given an indication of time, it is determined by the nature of the existence of the subject. Basically it is typical for factual questions.
Now the long time average. The question "How many times a week do You watch TV?" already indicates the present average time that exists as long. In other words, I watch TV on average 4 times a week for a relatively long time.
Respondents always try to understand the researcher and to correct his mistakes. If we ask the question without specifying the time of occurrence of a given event, the Respondent itself sets this time. The questions "How often do You watch TV?" or "How often do You go to a movie?" and so essentially defined out of time. The Respondent itself establishes the average real long time and says "often", considering that on average he goes to the movies once a week, and watching TV every day for two hours. If we ask, "Are You able to buy a color TV?", the Respondent may assume that we are talking about this a long time, for example, during the month or year. But it is impossible to put Respondent in an uncertain position. This complicates his work, but most importantly may result in inadequate interpretation of the results of the study.
You can specify the time for a number of issues, then it is not necessary to specify each question of the block. For example, "the last bell Rang and now, summing up the results of his studies in school, can You say that..." and next comes a series of questions about attitude to school, to teachers, to individual items, etc. But it is clear that in these matters we are talking about training time in school.
Past time. The reference to past time also has its own characteristics. "There were at You cases of nonfulfillment during the year?". If the survey was carried out in the middle of the year, then what about the year in question: calendar or at the time of the survey? "What was Your GPA in College?". Here can be three seasons: grades for each year of study, academic average during all five years of study and academic performance over a school year. If you do not specify what grades mean, you can get quite a variety of quantitative distribution. The academic performance of students by years of study are various. In the last year, as a rule, better than on the ground and averaged over five years, and which average profitable for him, so he will show while the researcher had in mind, for example, the average grades for all years.
Just like there is now extensive, there is a long past time. "Do You do any sports during study in University?". In principle, the question can be put. If it is for five years, at least once ran jogged around the stadium, you can answer in the affirmative and in the end get 100% coverage of student sport.
Of course, you can give extremely wide time, and for some special tasks, it is quite acceptable. For example: "did You ever in your life the counter the disruptive actions?" Time here is very wide, but it can make sense if we set out to identify a group of respondents who have never had a counter hooligan actions, to specifically study. It is no accident they put up such a temporary pointer "sometime in your life."
In sociological questionnaires commonly used the past a long time. Specific since, for example, "have You Watched yesterday a TV program "Health"?" cannot be used because of the nature of the survey, except for special occasions. Nevertheless, any long elapsed time has its limits, which must always be specified.