Saturday, January 11, 2020

Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from Closer Weekly

Kate Middleton's Watch: Find out Where to Get the Duchess ...

Closer Weekly-Jul. 19, 2017
The delicate piece — Kate is thought to wear the 33mm size — is part of the ... gave his then-girlfriend, Kate, a rose-gold Victorian ring studded with pearls and ... Kate Middleton Wows in Unusual Pearl Necklace During Poland Tour — Get the ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from

The Duchess of Cambridge masters Parisian chic in an ... 17, 2017
The black dress was by Alexander McQueen, the fashion house to which the Duchess ... The Duchess's pearl jewellery- a gobstopper ring, bauble necklace and ...
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from

Duchess of Cambridge wears Queen's pearls as royal family ... 20, 2017
... was wearing a black lace dress and the Queen's Four Row Japanese Pearl Choker ... Cross of the Royal Victorian Order (GCVO) for services to the sovereign.
Story image for Victorian Fashion, pearl from

15 of the Most Expensive Pieces of Jewelry Ever Shown on ... 1, 2017
As an unabashed fan of PBS's Antiques Roadshow, I am here to tell you, my fellow millennials, two things: A) Watching this show is the only way to get through ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

The transition from possibly true to true is done by numerous private actions in relation to another object occurring in the period of its existence. In other words, to understand the other object, its essence, content and trajectory need to perform a probe action on this object and only him during the period of its existence, i.e. in the period when it changes do not adversely affect the process of cognition. We are talking about the period during which a person can understand the object, but not in General, but within the framework of the solution of his problem.
Consciousness is insidious: to save effort it attributes them used to the notion of a kind of objective consciousness apart from existence. So, when someone uses the term "really" occurs, or "is" some absolute environment, it seems that consciousness testifies to the objective reality of these phenomena that exist apart from consciousness.
Phenomena really exist outside of consciousness. But it is consciousness that ascribes some kind of objective reality of their essence and characteristics, based on their tasks. We don't use the term "some reality". People when solving your tasks in the compulsory uses the products of the external environment. The latter, acting through the receptors on our senses, let them know about the essence, characteristics, etc. Knowing them, a person tries to accommodate these external products, according to their nature, for solving their problems and thereby assigns them to a new entity, for the external product, delivered in a new situation, with the necessity acquires a new entity or some variation of it. It follows that the term "really" is changed or the term "acts" is only the attribution of the external environment, it subjects certain entities that arose when using the same entity in the result of solving a particular problem. So when we say that the objects do change over time, this means that when solving your tasks a man uses such an external indicator, such as changing items in any sequence. In this case, they (the changes) do exist.
But a person can ascribe to a different order of change: creation, destruction, parallel, discontinuity, uniform and non-changing, and can even fix not a change, instability, volatility and so forth the various parameters of objective reality, when the object seems to be losing its absoluteness and becomes dependent on the will of man. Thus, it is possible to fall into the other extreme and come again in the history of philosophy to insoluble contradiction: if the object exists with its essence independently of the mind with its essence, or it is the fruit of human creativity, its purely subjective perception of things. This means that a person ascribes to objects interested in its quality, properties and characteristics.