Continuous change would be deployed without any reference to continuous monotony. Would eat in there would be hidden the possibility of a renewal of past impressions, none they would not be found out how similar or not similar the preceding impression. This power to evoke the idea re-determines at least the possibility of identifying as quasiparabolic (as neighbours and contemporaries as existing almost the same way) two impressions, one of which being present in the moment, while the other, perhaps already for a long time ceased to exist. Without imagination there would be similarities between the things.
Continuous change
ReplyDeletewould be deployed without any reference to continuous
monotony. Would eat in there would be hidden
the possibility of a renewal of past impressions, none
they would not be found out how similar or not similar
the preceding impression. This power to evoke the idea
re-determines at least the possibility of identifying as
quasiparabolic (as neighbours and contemporaries as existing
almost the same way) two impressions, one of which
being present in the moment, while the other,
perhaps already for a long time ceased
to exist. Without imagination there would be similarities between the
things.