So, a dual requirement: it is necessary to the presented items were heard persistent whispers of similarity; it is necessary that the representation can always be a haven imagination. None of these requirements can not be separated from another, which it complements and confronts him. Here two directions of analysis which have been preserved for the whole classical era and continued their convergence, while in the second half of the eighteenth century expressed in the end common truth in Ideology. On the one hand, there is the analysis takes into account the transformation of a series of shows in irrelevant, but simultaneous table of comparisons: the analysis impressions, memories, imagination, memory, the whole involuntary basis, which is like mechanics image in time. On the other hand, there is analysis taking into account the similarity of things -- the similarities to organize them, prior to their decomposition into identical and razlichayushchiesya elements to repeat the table of their disparate likes: however, why things appear in their confusion, in mixtures, in weave, in which is their essential procedure distorted, but enough see even that would Shine through under the form of similarities, a vague similarity of cases, containing a hint to the vigilant memory?
So, a dual requirement: it is necessary to
ReplyDeletethe presented items were heard persistent whispers of similarity;
it is necessary that the representation can always be a haven
imagination. None of these requirements can not be separated
from another, which it complements and confronts him. Here
two directions of analysis which have been preserved for
the whole classical era and continued their convergence,
while in the second half of the eighteenth century expressed in the end
common truth in Ideology. On the one hand, there is
the analysis takes into account the transformation of a series of shows in
irrelevant, but simultaneous table of comparisons: the analysis
impressions, memories, imagination, memory, the whole
involuntary basis, which is like mechanics
image in time. On the other hand, there is analysis
taking into account the similarity of things -- the similarities to organize them,
prior to their decomposition into identical and razlichayushchiesya elements to
repeat the table of their disparate likes: however, why
things appear in their confusion, in mixtures, in weave, in
which is their essential procedure distorted, but enough
see even that would Shine through under the form of similarities,
a vague similarity of cases, containing a hint to the vigilant
memory?