These two forms of analysis equally insufficient as the fundamental circumstance for the classic episteme is not the success or failure of mechanism, not a right or the ability to matematiktorvet nature, namely the attitude to the mathesis, which remained constant and unchanged until the end of the XVIII century. This relationship contains two significant characteristic. The first is that the relationship between things conceptualized in the form of order and measurement, but with the that fundamental inconsistencies between them, because of which problems measures can always be reduced to problems order. Thus, the ratio of any knowledge to the mathesis is given as the ability to set between things, even immeasurable, orderly sequence. In this sense, the analysis very quickly acquires a value a universal method; and the idea of Leibniz to develop mathematics of qualitative orders is situated in the heart classical thinking; it is around him she is everything fully rotates. Ho, on the other hand, it is relevant to the mathesis as a General science of order does not mean no absorb knowledge of mathematics or justification of mathematics every possible knowledge; on the contrary, in connection with the search the mathesis appears a certain number of empirical fields which until that time was neither formed nor defined. Almost none of these areas are impossible to find and track mechanism or the mathematization; and yet they formed on the basis of a possible science o order. If they really ascended to the Analysis in General, their specific instrument was not the algebraic method but the system of signs. So there was a General grammar, natural history, analysis wealth, that is, the science o the order in the sphere of words, forms of existence and needs.
These two forms of analysis equally insufficient as
ReplyDeletethe fundamental circumstance for the classic episteme
is not the success or failure of mechanism, not a right or
the ability to matematiktorvet nature, namely the attitude to
the mathesis, which remained constant and unchanged until
the end of the XVIII century. This relationship contains two significant
characteristic. The first is that the relationship between
things conceptualized in the form of order and measurement, but with the
that fundamental inconsistencies between them, because of
which problems measures can always be reduced to problems
order. Thus, the ratio of any
knowledge to the mathesis is given as the ability to set between
things, even immeasurable, orderly sequence. In
this sense, the analysis very quickly acquires a value
a universal method; and the idea of Leibniz to develop
mathematics of qualitative orders is situated in the heart
classical thinking; it is around him she is everything
fully rotates. Ho, on the other hand, it is relevant to
the mathesis as a General science of order does not mean no
absorb knowledge of mathematics or justification of mathematics
every possible knowledge; on the contrary, in connection with the search
the mathesis appears a certain number of empirical fields
which until that time was neither formed nor
defined. Almost none of these areas are impossible to find
and track mechanism or the mathematization; and yet they
formed on the basis of a possible science o order. If they
really ascended to the Analysis in General, their specific
instrument was not the algebraic method but the system of signs.
So there was a General grammar, natural history, analysis
wealth, that is, the science o the order in the sphere of words, forms of existence and
needs.