All these empirical scope -- new in the classical age and develop along with it (chronological reference points for them are Laslo and BOPP, Ray and Cuvier, petty and Ricardo, the first of them wrote about 1660 and the second in 1800 - 1810 years) -- could to emerge without the attitude that the entire episteme of Western cultures were then supported with a universal science o order. This relation to Order is as essential to the classical era like the Renaissance -- the attitude Interpretation. And as interpretation in the sixteenth century, combining mellow with a hermeneutics, was essentially a knowledge of the similarity and ordering by signs, believes all empirical knowledge as knowledge of identities and differences. Uncertain and simultaneously closed, holistic and tautological world of resemblance, and broke as would have been revealed in the middle. On one edge of the detected signs, which became the tools of analysis, marks of identity and difference, principles of sequencing, the key to creating a taxonomy; on other-empirical and faint resemblance of things, that an underlying similarity that under the cover of thinking is becoming the infinite source of mechanical operation and distributions. One side-a General theory of signs, divisions, and classifications; on the other-the problem of immediate resemblances, of the spontaneous movement of the imagination, the repetitions of nature. Between them are new knowledge which is the open space.
All these empirical scope -- new in
ReplyDeletethe classical age and develop along with it
(chronological reference points for them are Laslo and BOPP,
Ray and Cuvier, petty and Ricardo, the first of them wrote about
1660 and the second in 1800 - 1810 years) -- could
to emerge without the attitude that the entire episteme of Western
cultures were then supported with a universal science o order.
This relation to Order is as essential to
the classical era like the Renaissance -- the attitude
Interpretation. And as interpretation in the sixteenth century, combining
mellow with a hermeneutics, was essentially a knowledge of the
similarity and ordering by signs, believes all
empirical knowledge as knowledge of identities and differences.
Uncertain and simultaneously closed, holistic and
tautological world of resemblance, and broke as would have been revealed
in the middle. On one edge of the detected signs, which became
the tools of analysis, marks of identity and difference,
principles of sequencing, the key to creating a taxonomy; on
other-empirical and faint resemblance of things, that
an underlying similarity that under the cover of thinking is becoming
the infinite source of mechanical operation and distributions. One
side-a General theory of signs, divisions, and classifications;
on the other-the problem of immediate resemblances, of the spontaneous
movement of the imagination, the repetitions of nature. Between them
are new knowledge which is the
open space.