This is in its diversity is a critical measure of the language that need occurs when language asks the themselves, beginning with its function. In the classical age review and critique sharply opposed to each other. Speaking about the language in terms of representations and truth, criticism judges and profanes it. Keeping the language, invading all his existence, and asking him about his secrets review stops in front of difficulties to overcome the source of the text; he puts before himself the impossible task always renewable, to create within ourselves the birth this text: review fetishizmom text. These two methods justification of the relationship of language to yourself from now on, come in the rivalry between them, from which we have not yet found output. It is possible that this rivalry even increases. The fact that literature as a privileged object after criticism of mallarmé has not ceased to get closer to what there is a language in its very being, and thus it requires a second language, which would have no form of criticism, but a form comment. Indeed, since the nineteenth century, all critical languages burdened with interpretation, as the interpretation in the classical age was burdened with critical methods. However, while the question o the origin of language to the view will not be solved or at least bypassed in the framework of our culture, all secondary languages will be considered in alternative critics or comment. And they will endlessly grow in their uncertainty.
This is in its diversity is a critical measure of the language
ReplyDeletethat need occurs when language asks the
themselves, beginning with its function. In the classical age
review and critique sharply opposed to each other.
Speaking about the language in terms of representations and truth, criticism
judges and profanes it. Keeping the language, invading all
his existence, and asking him about his secrets
review stops in front of difficulties to overcome
the source of the text; he puts before himself the impossible task
always renewable, to create within ourselves the birth
this text: review fetishizmom text. These two methods
justification of the relationship of language to yourself from now on, come in
the rivalry between them, from which we have not yet found
output. It is possible that this rivalry even increases.
The fact that literature as a privileged object
after criticism of mallarmé has not ceased to get closer to what
there is a language in its very being, and thus it requires a second
language, which would have no form of criticism, but a form
comment. Indeed, since the nineteenth century, all critical languages
burdened with interpretation, as the interpretation in the classical age
was burdened with critical methods. However, while
the question o the origin of language to the view will not be solved
or at least bypassed in the framework of our culture, all
secondary languages will be considered in alternative critics
or comment. And they will endlessly grow in their
uncertainty.