I would add to that even just one word. Baudelaire considers this ironic glorification of the present, this game is freedom and reality, transforming reality, this ascetic treatment of yourself possible society as such, within the political body. All of this can happen only in a special place - this is what Baudelaire calls art. I do not pretend to reduce to these few the characteristics of such a complex historical event, like the Aufkl(rung end The EIGHTEENTH century, or, moreover, the installation of modernity in all its forms, which she took over the last two centuries. I wanted to emphasize, on the one hand, the rootedness Aufkl(rung in the type of philosophical question that problematisizes both relevant to really, the way of the historical existence and the Constitution itself itself as a standalone entity; and on the other that we are connected to Aufkl(not rung true to the elements of some doctrine, but rather a constant a return to a certain setting - that is, to the philosophic ethos, which be described as a permanent critique of our historical existence. I would like briefly describe how this ethos.
I would add to that even just one word. Baudelaire considers
ReplyDeletethis ironic glorification of the present, this game is freedom and reality,
transforming reality, this ascetic treatment of yourself possible
society as such, within the political body. All of this can happen
only in a special place - this is what Baudelaire calls art.
I do not pretend to reduce to these few
the characteristics of such a complex historical event, like the Aufkl(rung end
The EIGHTEENTH century, or, moreover, the installation of modernity in all its forms, which
she took over the last two centuries.
I wanted to emphasize, on the one hand, the rootedness Aufkl(rung in
the type of philosophical question that problematisizes both relevant to
really, the way of the historical existence and the Constitution itself
itself as a standalone entity; and on the other that we are connected to
Aufkl(not rung true to the elements of some doctrine, but rather a constant
a return to a certain setting - that is, to the philosophic ethos, which
be described as a permanent critique of our historical existence. I would like
briefly describe how this ethos.