The overall organization of empirical units can be now shown in its entirety<$F??. the diagram on page 287.>. First of all, it should be noted that the analysis of wealth obeys the same configuration as the natural history and universal grammar. Indeed, the theory of value allows to explain (or want and need, or inexhaustible of nature) how certain objects can be introduced into the system exchanges, as due to the primitive process one thing can be given as an equivalent for another; as assessment of the first things can to be adapted to the evaluation of the second according to the relation of equality (And and they have the same value) or analogy (the value of Oh, where has my partner, for my needs is the same thing for him -- the cost In which I possess). Thus, the cost corresponds to the attribute the function that the universal grammar is provided by the verb and, constituirea proposal, believes that the primary threshold, from which language arises. But when assessing the cost becomes the cost of appraisal, that is, when it is determined and confined to the limits of the system, composed by all possible exchanges, then each value is divided by all and relies other: from this point on the cost function joints that universal grammar is recognized for all nepuganye elements of the proposals (i.e. names nouns and each of the words that explicitly or implicitly has a nominal function). In the system of exchanges, in the game, allowing each portion of wealth to signify the others or to be does them, the cost is both a verb and noun, the ability to associate and principle analysis, articulation and dismemberment. Cost analysis resources occupies exactly the same position which natural history takes structure; and structure, it in the same operation connects the function allowing to attribute a sign to another sign, one view another, and a feature that allows you to articulate the elements that make up a set of ideas or characters, which they dismembered.
The overall organization of empirical units can be
ReplyDeletenow shown in its entirety<$F??. the diagram on page 287.>.
First of all, it should be noted that the analysis of wealth
obeys the same configuration as the natural history
and universal grammar. Indeed, the theory of value allows
to explain (or want and need, or inexhaustible
of nature) how certain objects can be introduced into the system
exchanges, as due to the primitive process one thing can be
given as an equivalent for another; as assessment of the first things can
to be adapted to the evaluation of the second according to the relation of equality (And
and they have the same value) or analogy (the value of
Oh, where has my partner, for my needs
is the same thing for him -- the cost In which I
possess). Thus, the cost corresponds to the attribute
the function that the universal grammar is provided by the verb
and, constituirea proposal, believes that the primary threshold,
from which language arises. But when assessing the cost
becomes the cost of appraisal, that is, when it is determined
and confined to the limits of the system, composed by all possible
exchanges, then each value is divided by all and relies
other: from this point on the cost function
joints that universal grammar is recognized for all
nepuganye elements of the proposals (i.e. names
nouns and each of the words that explicitly or implicitly
has a nominal function). In the system of exchanges, in the game,
allowing each portion of wealth to signify the others or to be
does them, the cost is both a verb and
noun, the ability to associate and principle
analysis, articulation and dismemberment. Cost analysis resources
occupies exactly the same position
which natural history takes structure; and
structure, it in the same operation connects the function
allowing to attribute a sign to another sign, one view
another, and a feature that allows you to articulate the elements that make up
a set of ideas or characters, which they dismembered.