But in order for it not to be reduced to a simple approval or the empty dream of freedom, this historical-critical installation, I should be at the same time install experimental. I I want to say that this work, produced with our own limits should, on the one hand, to open the field of historical studies, and on the other - to expose myself to the test of reality and relevance, at the same time and in order. to track the point where change was possible and it is desirable, and to determine the exact form that must be it change. In other words, this historical ontology of ourselves must to unsubscribe from all projects that claim to be global and radical. Because the experience shows that the claim to escape from the modern system and to give the programme of the new society, a new way of thinking, a new culture, a new vision of the world do not lead to anything other than playback the most dangerous traditions. I feel closer to those quite distinct variations that have become possible in several areas in the last twenty years; changes concerning the methods to be to think, relations of authority, sexual relations, how we perceived madness and disease. These, even partial changes taking place in the interaction of historical analysis and practical installation, I prefer the promises of a "new man", which is repeated in throughout the twentieth century the worst of political systems.
But in order for it not to be reduced to a simple approval or
ReplyDeletethe empty dream of freedom, this historical-critical installation, I
should be at the same time install experimental. I
I want to say that this work, produced with our own limits
should, on the one hand, to open the field of historical studies, and on the other
- to expose myself to the test of reality and relevance, at the same time
and in order. to track the point where change was possible and
it is desirable, and to determine the exact form that must be it
change. In other words, this historical ontology of ourselves must
to unsubscribe from all projects that claim to be global and radical.
Because the experience shows that the claim to escape from the modern system and
to give the programme of the new society, a new way of thinking, a new
culture, a new vision of the world do not lead to anything other than playback
the most dangerous traditions.
I feel closer to those quite distinct variations that have become possible in several
areas in the last twenty years; changes concerning the methods to be
to think, relations of authority, sexual relations, how we
perceived madness and disease. These, even partial changes
taking place in the interaction of historical analysis and practical
installation, I prefer the promises of a "new man", which is repeated in
throughout the twentieth century the worst of political systems.