Pages

Friday, August 9, 2019

Story image for bridal jewelry from FinSMEs
FinSMEs

JamesAllen.com Raises $140 Million Growth Equity Investment from ...

Business Wire (press release)-Apr. 6, 2017
“We are very excited to be investing in JamesAllen.com to help them offer not only incredible value in bridal jewelry, but to become the jeweler for life for savvy ...
Story image for bridal jewelry from San Francisco Chronicle

Bridget King jewelry: Dazzling twist on tradition

San Francisco Chronicle-Jun. 1, 2017
When it comes to jewelry for brides and bridal parties, her philosophy is simple: “You don't want to look back in 20 years at your wedding photos and say, 'What ...
Story image for bridal jewelry from Fashionista (blog)

Can Old-School Fine Jewelry Brands Woo Fickle Millennials?

Fashionista (blog)-Dec. 15, 2017
And with increased competition from fashion brands and newer jewelry ... for jewellers as bridal and other relationship milestone-related jewellery," it notes.
Story image for bridal jewelry from New York Times

Jewelry Gets Ready to Party

New York Times-Sep. 12, 2017
“Minimalism has been a trend for so long in fine jewelry, I think it's time for big, fun statement pieces to come .... Demure bridal diamonds and pearls it was not.

1 comment:

  1. Now it's time to give one or two examples of mythical speech. First
    the example I will borrow from Valerie [4]: imagine that I am a disciple of the fifth
    class French school, I open Latin grammar and read it
    the phrase, taken from the fables of Aesop or Phaedrus: quia ego nominor leo. I lay
    book and think the phrase has some ambiguity. One
    hand, the meaning of the words is perfectly clear: BECAUSE I am CALLED LION. On the other
    hand, this phrase is given here explicitly in order to let me know
    something else altogether, turning to me, the pupil of the fifth class, it is clear
    tells me I am an example that should illustrate the rule
    harmonization of predicate with subject. Even have to admit that this
    the phrase does not have in order to give me its meaning, it is very little
    concerned to tell me something about the lion, about his name; it
    true the final value is to attract my attention to
    a certain type of coordination. From this I conclude that in front of me
    special built-semiological system that goes beyond language: it
    meaning itself is formed by a plurality of marks, and is itself
    the primary semiological system (I am a LION). The rest
    the formal scheme is constructed in the usual way: there is a signified (I AM an EXAMPLE
    The RULES of GRAMMAR) and has a global value that represents
    the result of the correlation of the signifier and the signified; for neither the naming
    animal a lion or an example of grammatical rule is not given to me by
    separately.

    ReplyDelete