We see that we face are almost identical with CH. S. Pierce classification of signs. In subsequent polivanovskiy "Lectures for introduction to linguistics and General phonetics" (See: Polivanov E. D. Lectures on introduction to linguistics and General phonetics. -- Berlin, 1923) quite a few iconic material, they are mostly focused phonetically. And even this phonetic interest of E. D. Polivanov manifested in its influence upon the B. B. Shklovsky. VG casketquotes the following oral memory of J. O. Zundelovich about E. D. Polivanov: "And incidentally, he's not humble without pride, said: "Here regarding the resurrection of the worldly-automatic in art. Say: recognition (I would say, rather, identification) and vision, traditional motives and update their combinations. But Shklovsky first only there was that "resurrection", "defamiliarisation". Don't you know? A single term! And BINOMDIST emerged already, at my suggestion, by analogy with the theory of phonemes: the actual modification of the phoneme and the phoneme with which they are associated, functionally meaningful and insignificant (or only indirectly meaningful)" (Lartsev V. G. Yevgeny Dmitrievich Polivanov. Pages of life and activities. -- M., 1988. P.141).
We see that we face are almost identical with
ReplyDeleteCH. S. Pierce classification of signs. In subsequent polivanovskiy "Lectures
for introduction to linguistics and General phonetics" (See: Polivanov E. D.
Lectures on introduction to linguistics and General phonetics. -- Berlin, 1923)
quite a few iconic material, they are mostly focused
phonetically. And even this phonetic interest of E. D. Polivanov
manifested in its influence upon the B. B. Shklovsky. VG casketquotes
the following oral memory of J. O. Zundelovich about E. D. Polivanov:
"And incidentally, he's not humble without pride, said: "Here
regarding the resurrection of the worldly-automatic in art. Say:
recognition (I would say, rather, identification) and vision, traditional
motives and update their combinations. But Shklovsky first
only there was that "resurrection", "defamiliarisation". Don't you know? A single term! And
BINOMDIST emerged already, at my suggestion, by analogy with the theory of phonemes:
the actual modification of the phoneme and the phoneme with which they are associated,
functionally meaningful and insignificant (or only indirectly meaningful)"
(Lartsev V. G. Yevgeny Dmitrievich Polivanov. Pages of life and
activities. -- M., 1988. P.141).