However, since in all these cases, the costs (salary fee, capital, profits, revenues) are determined by the work that already completed and applied in this new production, you can see as there is a long linear and uniform number -- a number production. Every work has a result, which in this or another form is used in some new work, defining its the cost of this new work in turn is involved in the formation of new value, etc. Is consistent accumulation first decisively broke with the vzaimoponimaniya, which only takes into attention in the classical analysis of wealth. It introduces thus the possibility of a continuous historical time, even if in fact, as we shall see later, Ricardo thinks of a future the evolution only in the form of slowing down and ultimately complete stop history. At the level of conditions of possibility thinking Ricardo, Department of education value, representativeness, have managed to identify vzaimosochetaemost economy and history. "Wealth", instead of being distributed in the table, creating thus, the system of equivalences, is organized and accumulated over time: any value is determined not the tools to analyze it, but with conditions production, which gave it birth. In turn these the conditions are determined by the amount of labor expended in their production. Long before economic reflection with discursive clarity was associated with history of events or societies, the historicity entered -- apparently permanently -- in itself a way of being of the economy. The economy in its positivity is associated no longer with a simultaneous space of differences and identities, but with the time of successive productions.
Second, and equally important consequence associated with the concept the rarity of goods. Classical analysis determined the uncommon goods relating it to the needs. It was assumed that rarity increases, or moves to another object in depending on the needs, which increase or take new forms; for the hungry -- a rare bread, for the rich rotating in the light, -- the rarity of the jewelry. Economists of the eighteenth century physiocrats, and not the physiocrats, believed that land, agricultural labor allow, at least in part, to overcome this rare wealth; the land has a wonderful the ability to meet the much more numerous needs than the needs of the people, its manufacturing. For classic thinking uncommon wealth exists because people imagine the objects they have, and the wealth exists because the earth produces abundance in a products that are not consumed immediately and which, therefore, could imagine other objects in acts of exchange and handling. Ricardo turns the strip of this analysis -- the apparent generosity the earth owes in fact its increasing impoverishment: the primary is not need and not the performance requirements in the minds of people: but it is this initial lack of benefits.
However, since in all these cases, the costs (salary
ReplyDeletefee, capital, profits, revenues) are determined by the work that
already completed and applied in this new production, you can see
as there is a long linear and uniform number -- a number
production. Every work has a result, which in this or
another form is used in some new work, defining its
the cost of this new work in turn is involved in
the formation of new value, etc. Is consistent
accumulation first decisively broke with the
vzaimoponimaniya, which only takes into
attention in the classical analysis of wealth. It introduces thus
the possibility of a continuous historical time, even if
in fact, as we shall see later, Ricardo thinks of a future
the evolution only in the form of slowing down and ultimately complete
stop history. At the level of conditions of possibility thinking
Ricardo, Department of education value, representativeness,
have managed to identify vzaimosochetaemost economy and history.
"Wealth", instead of being distributed in the table, creating
thus, the system of equivalences, is organized and accumulated
over time: any value is determined not
the tools to analyze it, but with conditions
production, which gave it birth. In turn these
the conditions are determined by the amount of labor expended in their
production. Long before economic reflection with
discursive clarity was associated with history of events or
societies, the historicity entered -- apparently permanently -- in itself
a way of being of the economy. The economy in its positivity is associated
no longer with a simultaneous space of differences and identities, but with
the time of successive productions.
Second, and equally important consequence associated with the concept
ReplyDeletethe rarity of goods. Classical analysis determined the uncommon goods
relating it to the needs. It was assumed that
rarity increases, or moves to another object in
depending on the needs, which increase or take
new forms; for the hungry -- a rare bread, for the rich
rotating in the light, -- the rarity of the jewelry. Economists of the eighteenth
century physiocrats, and not the physiocrats, believed that
land, agricultural labor allow, at least in part,
to overcome this rare wealth; the land has a wonderful
the ability to meet the much more numerous
needs than the needs of the people, its manufacturing. For
classic thinking uncommon wealth exists because people
imagine the objects they have, and the wealth
exists because the earth produces abundance in a
products that are not consumed immediately and which, therefore,
could imagine other objects in acts of exchange and handling.
Ricardo turns the strip of this analysis -- the apparent generosity
the earth owes in fact its increasing impoverishment:
the primary is not need and not the performance requirements in the minds of
people: but it is this initial lack of benefits.