Turning on the market share at each other, the cost have also the ability to view. However, this ability is removed they are not from exchange, but only from work that precedes every performance and prejudge it, but therefore, cannot be determined by the exchange. If classical thought trade and exchange serve as the basis analysis of wealth, on which the analysis is not (this is typical and Adam Smith, whose division of labor subject to criteria exchange), starting with Ricardo, the possibility of exchange is based on the work, and the theory of production must henceforth be always be preceded by the theory of circulation. Hence three consequences that you should pay attention to. The first is a completely new form of establishing causal series. In the XVIII century the interdependence of economic determinations not neglected, rather the opposite: he explained how the money can be spent and re-flow, price-rise and fall production -- to increase, stagnate or to decrease; however, these changes were determined by the space of the table in which value could introduce each other. So. value increased, as representing the elements increased faster represented; production diminished, if the view was decreased in comparison with the subject performance things, etc. In all these cases, it was only about surface causality, is not go out from the circle interdependencies to be analyzed and analyzing. On the contrary, since Ricardo, labor, disengaged from the presentation and settled in the area where she has no power, already organized in accordance with its own a causation. The amount of labor required for the manufacture, collection or carriage of any thing, and determining its value depends on forms of production: depending on degree of separation labour, on the number and nature of tools, from the relationship between the total amount of capital at the disposal of the entrepreneur, and the capital that it invests in the structure of the factory, production changes, becoming accordingly, it is more expensive
Turning on
ReplyDeletethe market share at each other, the cost have also
the ability to view. However, this ability is removed
they are not from exchange, but only from work that
precedes every performance and prejudge it, but
therefore, cannot be determined by the exchange. If
classical thought trade and exchange serve as the basis
analysis of wealth, on which the analysis is not (this is typical
and Adam Smith, whose division of labor subject to criteria
exchange), starting with Ricardo, the possibility of exchange is based
on the work, and the theory of production must henceforth be always
be preceded by the theory of circulation.
Hence three consequences that you should pay attention to.
The first is a completely new form of establishing causal
series. In the XVIII century the interdependence of economic determinations
not neglected, rather the opposite: he explained how the money
can be spent and re-flow, price-rise and
fall production -- to increase, stagnate or
to decrease; however, these changes were determined by the space
of the table in which value could introduce each other. So.
value increased, as representing the elements
increased faster represented; production diminished, if
the view was decreased in comparison with the subject
performance things, etc. In all these cases, it was only about
surface causality, is not go out from the circle
interdependencies to be analyzed and analyzing. On the contrary,
since Ricardo, labor, disengaged from the presentation and
settled in the area where she has no power,
already organized in accordance with its own
a causation. The amount of labor required for the manufacture,
collection or carriage of any thing, and determining its value
depends on forms of production: depending on degree of separation
labour, on the number and nature of tools, from the relationship between
the total amount of capital at the disposal of the
entrepreneur, and the capital that it invests in
the structure of the factory, production changes, becoming
accordingly, it is more expensive