tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post8716361757125768398..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-17300395081523212462019-12-29T21:04:33.996-08:002019-12-29T21:04:33.996-08:00In this
indifference, I suppose, we must recognize...In this<br />indifference, I suppose, we must recognize one of the fundamental ethical<br />principles of modern letters. I say "ethical" because it is<br />indifference is not so much a feature that characterizes the way<br />say or write, what, rather, a kind of immanent rule, without<br />the end again and again renewable, but never fully executable<br />the principle, which disguises not so much a letter as a result, how much<br />dominates him as practice. This rule is too well-known to<br />you needed to analyze it; it will be enough<br />to specify it through two of his most important themes. First, we can say,<br />today's letter was released from the topic of the expression: it refers only to<br />himself, and, however, it is not taken in the form of "internal" - it<br />identificireba with its own deployed "outside". This means<br />that letter is a game of signs, not so much ordered to their signified<br />contents, how the very nature of the signifier; but it also means that<br />regular emails are all being put to the test by their<br />boundaries; the letter incessantly transgresses and reverses the regularity<br />which it receives and which it plays; writing unfolds like a game,<br />which inevitably goes beyond their rules, and proceeds thus<br />outside. In the case of the letter the point is not in the detection or<br />the exaltation of the gesture of writing; it is not about prishpilivayut a<br />of the subject in language, the issue is about opening some space in<br />which the writing subject does not cease to disappear. The second theme even more<br />familiar: it is the affinity of the letter and of death. This relationship reverses millennial<br />theme; the legend and the epic of the Greeks was intended to perpetuate<br />the immortality of the hero. And if the hero was willing to die young, it in order<br />that his life, consecrated and thus glorified by death, passed into<br />immortality; the story was the ransom for this adopted death. Arabic story<br />(I think there are about one Thousand and one nights), albeit a little differently, too, had their<br />motif, theme and the pretext of "not to die" - the conversation, the story lasted until<br />early morning it is in order to push back death, to repel this<br />the term of payment, which was to close the mouth of the narrator. Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com