tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post8423720103115554286..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-36844126186863874572020-01-02T00:12:19.850-08:002020-01-02T00:12:19.850-08:00The history of Russian semiotics we can represent ...The history of Russian semiotics we can represent with three<br />successive periods, the last of which becomes<br />the Moscow-Tartu school, completed by the death of Lotman and emigration it<br />the main participants.<br /> If the first period of Russian semiotics (up to 1917) we can<br />metaphorically imagined as "roots" of the future tree, the second period<br />up to 1953 (i.e., until the death of Stalin as a certain completion of the<br />the totalitarian operation of science) we can designate as "trunk". And<br />indeed, it is here were the strong figures. Today<br />each of them created centers (especially the figure of Mikhail Bakhtin),<br />published an ongoing series of papers, we still got not even all the texts from<br />what was written (often in a very short time) and was torn off<br />system.<br /> Really, these pieces were formed in the pre-revolutionary period, having<br />the possibility of normal intellectual growth within a single world without<br />subsequent strictly separated from all characteristic of totalitarian<br />development. Suffice it to mention such names as P. Florensky or M. Bakhtin,<br />G. Shpet or L. Karsavin, Yu or Eisenstein... This is no exaggeration<br />giants were closely within one of the areas of knowledge, and in<br />the Stalinist system. And sooner or later almost every one of them got in<br />the millstone of the repressive mechanism. Especially painful was leaking them<br />intelligent life due to the nature of their profession -- they were<br />humanitarians. For physicists, mathematicians and other natural scientists of the state<br />provided certain concessions and privileges, seeing them support<br />industrial and military potential of the country. However, if they didn't<br />a look behind the forbidden door -- in the world outside of their specialty.<br />Humanists were deprived of such care, they should get out<br />self. Such neglect social science can be<br />time, for example, the budget of the Academy of Sciences all academic institutions<br />take three percent of the funds. While on the other hand, it is humanitarian<br />science is constantly under the vigilant control where each text<br />many times it can be traced and verified, creating a sense of permanentPearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com