tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post6475697673336998791..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-47080628165499481772020-01-03T00:06:08.337-08:002020-01-03T00:06:08.337-08:00Because the language has become analysis and order... Because the language has become analysis and order, he strikes up<br />over time, the still unknown relationship. XVI century<br />assumed that languages throughout history have followed one after the other<br />and one of them could produce the other. The most ancient<br />were the main languages. Of all languages the most archaic,<br />because it was the language of the Almighty, when he spoke to the people,<br />Hebrew was considered the language that gave rise to drevnerimsky and<br />Arabic; then came Greek, from which as<br />Coptic and Egyptian; Latin, the relationship was<br />Italian, Spanish, and French; lastly, from the Teutonic<br />happened German, English and Flemish.<$F E. Guichard.<br />Harmonie ethymologique, 1606. CP.the classification of the same type<br />Scaliger (Diatribe de Europaeorum linguis) or Wilkins (An<br />essay towards a real character, London, 1668,p.3 et seq.).>.<br />Since the XVII century the relation of language to time is changed:<br />now the time has languages one after the other in<br />world history; now the languages are deploying performance and<br />the words in the order, the law which they<br />define yourself. Each language defines its specificity<br />by means of this internal order and the place which he<br />intended words, and not by their place in<br />the historical series. Time for a language is its internal<br />the method of analysis, not the place of his birth. Hence, as the<br />slight interest in the classical era to<br />chronological filiali, until its denial, in spite of<br />any "evidence" -- it comes o our evidence --<br />kinship is Italian and French with Latin<$F Lt Blan.<br />Theorie nouvelle de la parole, Paris, 1750. Latin language<br />passed Italian, French and Spanish only<br />"a few words".>. Historical ranks that existed in<br />The XVI century, and will arise again in the nineteenth, substituted typologies --<br />typologies of order. There is a group of languages, which in the first<br />place the object o which is spoken; then the action that he<br />commits or experiences; finally, the agent to which this<br />the item operates: for example, French, English,<br />Spanish.Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com