tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post6168274368280051864..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Wedding Guest Lis...Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-25328192438406082882019-12-19T11:08:52.554-08:002019-12-19T11:08:52.554-08:00What is the main idea of the book? What is the phi...What is the main idea of the book? What is the philosophical position of its author?<br />Phenomenology and existentialists criticized Foucault in positivism-whether<br />"positivism concepts" (Dufrenne), "positivism signs" (Sartre) or just<br />positivism as the absolutization of prepared, frozen forms of knowledge (Lebon).<br />Positivists refused to record Foucault in his camp: what is this<br />positivism, if it does not meet the laboratory criteria of genuine<br />scientific? (Boudon). Many critics saw as Foucault's characteristic features<br />phenomenological thinking (Val), e.g. the appearance of being in<br />heideggerian sense (Dufrenne), and even seen in "Words and things" almost<br />not "introduction to the philosophy of life of language" (Paren-Vial). In fact<br />was that episistomy in the concept of Foucault have much more<br />in common with the Kantian a priori structures of cognition, associated with<br />the perspective of the new cognitive experience, rather than with the use<br />linguistic models in levitanivka sense (Domenach, Man-Vial).<br />Sometimes the role of "Words and things" in the justification of modern humanitarian knowledge<br />even directly compared to the role of Kant's "critique of pure reason," in<br />the rationale for the natural Sciences (Kangeyam).<br /> Yes,indeed, and structuralism is it? What is Foucault --<br />"postructuralism", not realizing until the end of the task of structuralism as<br />the modern science of signs and semiotic systems (Val)? Or, perhaps,<br />the "poststructuralist" or "antistructural", long surpassed<br />the structuralist linguisticism and beyond the linguistic<br />methodology (Pettit, white)?Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com