tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post4247587499543228726..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-59379169009432744592019-09-20T07:16:10.212-07:002019-09-20T07:16:10.212-07:00Quickly sketching semiological schema. An example ...Quickly sketching semiological schema. An example constitutes<br />speech, the primary system is purely linguistic. Meaning<br />the secondary system consists of a certain number of lexical units (words:<br />premier 'first', amorcee 'has been', la - the definite article with the word<br />la baisse 'decrease'), or printing techniques: the large letters of the title<br />by which the reader usually communicate the most important news. The signified, or<br />the concept will have an inevitable, albeit barbaric neologism -<br />PRAVITELSTVENNOY, because the Government seems to be in the big press as<br />The quintessence of efficiency. Therefore, it is clear the value of the myth:<br />the price of fruit and vegetables reduced, BECAUSE it decided the government.<br />But in this, in General atypical, case, the newspaper itself, to protect<br />yourself or to save appearances, two lines below destroyed the myth that<br />just spawned; she adds (though in a smaller font):<br />"Lower prices contributes to seasonal saturation of the market." This example<br />instructive in two respects. First, it is a clear<br />shows that the myth is based on the suggestion, it needs to produce<br />immediate effect, no matter what then the myth is destroyed, because<br />it is expected that its impact will be more rational<br />explanation that can refute it later. This means that<br />reading of the myth takes place instantly. So I accidentally look in the newspaper<br />"France-Soir", which read, my neighbor, while I catch one only<br />SENSE, but with his help, I DEDUCT true value: I find the presence<br />the actions of the government in lowering the price of fruits and vegetables. This<br />enough. A more attentive reading of the myth will in no way increase and not<br />weaken the force of his impact, myth can neither be improved, nor to dispute;<br />neither time nor our knowledge is not capable of anything to add or subtract.<br />Naturalization of the concept, which I have just identified as the main function<br />myth, in this example, presented in exemplary fashion. In the primary system<br />(purely linguistic) causality has literally natural<br />in nature, the prices of vegetables and fruits fall because of the season. In<br />secondary system (mythological) causality is artificial, false, but<br />somehow she Udet Xia slip in the shopping arcade of Nature. In<br />the result, a myth is perceived as a harmless message and not because<br />his intentions are hidden (in this case, they would lose their effectiveness),<br />but because they are naturalized.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com