tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post3596050831361111773..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-73940801123683391402019-12-20T01:14:00.402-08:002019-12-20T01:14:00.402-08:00"what is given and what seems to
untested Exp..."what is given and what seems to<br />untested Explorer content, it is permissible in the more complex<br />a system of forms and juxtaposition of forms, the deeper he delves into this content.<br />This is the progress of science, allowing each content in the system of forms and each<br />"subject" -- in the system of relations, is the progress of poetry. The measure of content,<br />filling in this form, there is a definition of the level to which it has penetrated our<br />the analysis" (P. 425).<br /> Bringing this view to its logical conclusion, G. Shpet , even said<br />the following: "Poetics -- not aesthetics and not part and not the head of aesthetics. In<br />not all are aware. Poetics as little decide<br />aesthetic problems, like syntax and logic. Poetics is<br />discipline with technical. (...) The poetics needs to be teaching on<br />sensual and internal forms (poetic) words (language), regardless of<br />also, aesthetic or not" (P. 410). It's not really accepted point<br />of view, but it puts points over "i". She continues in-depth<br />understanding of the structure of words, peculiar to G. Shpet.<br /> Speaking about the character of G. Shpet separates it from allegory.<br />"Allegory -- rational, "smyslenno", ploskonka. Symbol --<br />creatively-prorochestvo and endless-endless. Allegory -- teosofia,<br />character -- mysterious. At least completely arbitrary, a symbol is a sign in the sense<br />"words" as a sign of other words, right (or metaphorically) calling a "thing"<br />(process characteristic effects). Therefore, the symbol is sui generis<br />suppositio. Therefore, the word, from the other end, is the prototype of all art.<br />So is its structure -- exhaustively complete and is the type of all<br />the aesthetic of the subject.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-61859931638476526372019-12-15T18:02:27.577-08:002019-12-15T18:02:27.577-08:00However, this hypothesis about the institution is ...However, this hypothesis about the institution is still too "heavy": it comes from "real" vision of what instituion. Today we know that the border, which puts the institution of the potential of the language in the "case" was never installed (even when formally it is available63). <br /><br /><br />In this sense, it follows, we think, to consider modern institutions of knowledge. <br />Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com