tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post3294311498499118292..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-27025311622558114722019-12-19T12:04:46.408-08:002019-12-19T12:04:46.408-08:00They guarantee us the reliability that we
sophisti...They guarantee us the reliability that we<br />sophisticated classification, when we say that a cat and a dog less<br />similar to each other than the two greyhounds, even if both are tame or<br />embalmed, even if both are running like crazy and even if they<br />just smashed the jug? What "the table", according to which space<br />identities, features of similarity, analogy, we are accustomed to distribute as much<br />different and similar things? What is this logic, which is clearly not<br />is determined a p R I o R n s m and the necessary grip and not<br />directly due to sensitive content? After all, the point here<br />is not about communication effects, but about the approach and selection of analysis<br />comparability and compatibility of specific contents; there is nothing more<br />unsteady, more empirical (at least apparently) than trying<br />to establish order among things; nothing requires a more careful eye<br />more reliable and better-developed language; nothing encourages us more<br />hard to rely on a variety of qualities and shapes. But even<br />the untutored eye, it is able to combine a few similar shapes and<br />to distinguish them from any others because of certain features --<br />in fact, even with the most naive practice any semblance, any difference<br />stems from well-defined operation and application of pre -<br />the established criterion. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-13944878226643563892019-12-15T01:11:10.627-08:002019-12-15T01:11:10.627-08:00Consensus is a horizon; it is always unattainable....Consensus is a horizon; it is always unattainable. Research conducted under the auspices of the paradigm213 tend to smooth things over; they like to develop one "idea": the technological, economic or artistic. But it is surprising that always comes someone to upset the "reasonable" order. You need to assume the existence of a force that destabilizie explanatory power and is manifested in the order of thought or norms, if you will, in the proposal of new rules of the scientific language game, outlining a new field of research. The process, called Tom "morphogenesis", revealed in scientific behavior. He is also subject to the rules (there are classes of accidents), but his determination is always local. Moved to science discussion and placed in the temporary term, this feature is reflected in the unpredictability of "discoveries." In relation to the ideal of transparency, it is a factor in the formation of blackouts, pushes the time of the consensus on later ?????214.<br />Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com