tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post2992863459611653901..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-69683182414420870952020-01-03T00:02:46.739-08:002020-01-03T00:02:46.739-08:00is present when between two things
approved by the...is present when between two things<br />approved by the attributive bond, when they say that it is<br />that <$F Condillac. Grammaire, p.115.>. All kind of verb<br />is reduced to one, which means to be. All the others secretly<br />perform this single function, but they hide it<br />masking definitions: definitions are added here, and<br />instead say, "I am singing", I say "I sing";<br />here are added and specify the time and instead of<br />to say, "when I am singing," say "I sang". Finally,<br />in some languages, verbs have integrated the subject itself, so<br />for example, the Romans saying, not ego vivit, but vivo. All this is not<br />other than the deposition and deposition of tongue around and over one<br />verbal, very small but essential function;<br />"there is only the verb to be...abiding in its simplicity"<br /><$F Logique de Port-Royal, p.107. Wed.: Condillac. Grammaire,<br />p.132-134.<br />In "L'origine des connaissances" history of the verb<br />analyzed several different way, but it's not<br />for his function.--D. Thiebault. Grammaire philosophique,<br />Paris, 1802, t.I, p.216.>. The whole essence of language is concentrated in<br />this one single word. Without it, all would remain<br />silent, and people, some animals could<br />to use their voice, but none of them emitted<br />screams never would put the beginning of the great chain of language.Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-22062022052903474302020-01-03T00:00:02.785-08:002020-01-03T00:00:02.785-08:00The fact that the discourse consists of words that...The fact that the discourse consists of words that<br />consistently refer to what the submission.<br /> The word designates, that is, by its nature it has a name.<br />A proper name, since it specifies only a certain<br />performance -- and nowhere else. So in contrast to<br />the uniformity of the verb, which is only universal<br />statement of attributively names are abundant, and it<br />endlessly. Ought to have as many of them as there<br />things which are subject to naming. But each name would then be<br />so strongly associated with only one view<br />it means that could not even Express<br />the slightest attributiveness; and the language would be degraded, "if we<br />had to amestitelj only their own names, they should<br />it would be multiplied without end. These words-and many of these words<br />burdened by the memory -- not arranged any objects<br />to our knowledge, nor, consequently, our ideas, and our speech<br />would be extremely confused" <$F Condillac. Grammaire,<br />p.152.>. Names can function in the phrase and allow<br />attributiveness only in the case if one of them (for<br />least attribute) indicates some common to many<br />representations of the element. The universality of the name as necessary<br />for parts of the discourse, but for forms of proposal you wish<br />the designation of being.Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com