tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post2275819065916944941..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-13944940845790007822019-12-18T22:13:39.289-08:002019-12-18T22:13:39.289-08:00This, of course,
depends on the definition which w...This, of course,<br />depends on the definition which we give the concept of the word. If we put as<br />the requirement for the word as such that it should serve to indicate<br />the concept, in General, to be meaningful, of course, "abstruse language" disappears as<br />something external to language" (ibid.P.13).<br /> Justice demands that we lead and the words R. O. Yakobson from his<br />study of the poetry of V. Khlebnikov, because it operates the same<br />problem: "Poetry is language in its aesthetic function. Thus,<br />the subject of the science of literature is not literature, but literariness, i.e.<br />what makes this work a literary work. Meanwhile to<br />still the historians of literature primarily likened the police, who,<br />with the aim to arrest a certain person, be captured in case of all<br />and all that was in the apartment, and passing by on the street<br />by. And historians of literature all was needful: life, psychology,<br />politics, philosophy. Instead of a science about the literature created by the conglomerate<br />home-grown disciplines" (Jacobson P. O. Works on poetics. -- M.<br />1987.With.275).<br /> The proposed idea is clear-it is the consolidation of its object, search<br />tools that will give the increase. A bigger object is easier<br />study, it more clearly visible. At the same time another scale "kills" as<br />irrelevant details that are visible from a different point of view. Enlargement<br />the poetic side of language, pushes into the background the value, the more<br />visible at this scale, and the speaker himself. It is in principle not necessary.<br /> E. D. Polivanov in his article "about the "sound gestures"<br />Japanese language" is talking about the elements of oral speech, "whose role in the language<br />analogous to the role of gesture" (Cm. Collections on the theory of poetic language. -- Vol.1.<br />P. 31). And then there is not even poetic, but purely semiotic object<br />research.<br /> E. D. Polivanov writes about a possible "dictionary" of gestures, as they<br />different for different cultures: "in Japan, speaking of himself, do not indicate<br />chest, as we do, and on the nose. The difference is the emotional gesture features<br />evident from the fact that some Nations use more gestures (Italians),<br />others (the British)" (ibid.P.33).Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com