However, the most fundamental to classical episteme property signs so far and not been formulated. Indeed, what sign can be more or less likely, more or less remote from the signified to them that he can be natural or artificial, and its nature and the value of the sign would not be thus affected, -- all this shows that the relation of sign to its content is not due to the order of things. Now attitude meaning oznacenom to be located in such a space, in which there is no intermediate figure is not causes more of them meeting: inside knowledge of this relationship is a relationship, installed between the idea of one thing and the idea of another thing. "The logic of port Royal" thus formulates it: "the Sign encloses two ideas -- the idea of a thing that represents and idea presented things, and the nature of the sign is the initiation of the first ideas the second
However, the most fundamental to classical episteme
ReplyDeleteproperty signs so far and not been formulated.
Indeed, what sign can be more or less
likely, more or less remote from the signified to them that he
can be natural or artificial, and its nature
and the value of the sign would not be thus affected, -- all this
shows that the relation of sign to its content is not
due to the order of things. Now attitude meaning
oznacenom to be located in such a space, in which
there is no intermediate figure is not causes more of them
meeting: inside knowledge of this relationship is a relationship,
installed between the idea of one thing and the idea of another thing.
"The logic of port Royal" thus formulates it: "the Sign encloses
two ideas -- the idea of a thing that represents and idea
presented things, and the nature of the sign is
the initiation of the first ideas the second