This new relation established by language to himself, is neither simple nor one-sided. In apparently, criticism is opposed to the review as an analysis of the visible forms disclosure of a hidden content. Ho as this form is the submission form, the criticism can analyze the language only in terms of truth, accuracy, property, or expressive significance. Hence the complex role criticism and ambiguity, from which it could never to get rid of. She examines language as if it was clean function, a set of mechanisms, a great Autonomous a system of signs. But she cannot at the same time not to ask him o the question of its truth or falsity, o its transparency or nebula, that is, o the nature of the presence that he said in words, through which he represents. It is precisely in this double, fundamental necessity gradually revealed and eventually took known place the juxtaposition of form and content. Ho is the opposition has undoubtedly been late when in the nineteenth century a critical attitude in turn was untenable. Criticism in the classical period involved, without decomposition and as if as a whole, the role of language in the analysis views.
This new relation established by language
ReplyDeleteto himself, is neither simple nor one-sided. In
apparently, criticism is opposed to the review as an analysis of the visible
forms disclosure of a hidden content. Ho as this form
is the submission form, the criticism can analyze
the language only in terms of truth, accuracy, property, or
expressive significance. Hence the complex role
criticism and ambiguity, from which it could never
to get rid of. She examines language as if it was clean
function, a set of mechanisms, a great Autonomous
a system of signs. But she cannot at the same time not to ask him
o the question of its truth or falsity, o its transparency or
nebula, that is, o the nature of the presence that he
said in words, through which he represents.
It is precisely in this double, fundamental necessity
gradually revealed and eventually took known
place the juxtaposition of form and content. Ho is
the opposition has undoubtedly been late when
in the nineteenth century a critical attitude in turn was
untenable. Criticism in the classical period involved, without
decomposition and as if as a whole, the role of language in the analysis
views.