The second variable of the sign: the form of his connection with what he means. Through the action of pregnancty, rivalry and especially liking the similarity in the sixteenth century conquered the space and time, as the role of the sign consisted in the connection and binding things. On the contrary, classicism is characterized by its sign sushestvenno variance. The cyclical world of convergent characters substituted endless deployment. In this space sign can take two positions: either he as part is part of explanation of what it is or it really and truly separated from it. In truth, this the alternative is not radical, as a sign to to function, and have simultaneously implemented in the signified, and different from him. Indeed, in order for the sign was mark, it is necessary that it was given to consciousness, however, that he means. As Condillac observes, the sound would never child verbal sign things if he would, at least again, was not heard at the moment of perception of this thing<$F Condillac. Essai sur l'origine des connaissances humaines (Euvres, Paris, 1798, t. I, p. 188--208).>.Ho to the element of perception could become familiar enough to was part of it; you have to select it as element and delivered from the General impression with which he implicitly linked; therefore, you need to make this impression was dismembered to the attention focused on one of the interwoven with other moment to this point is included in part of the common experience, were isolated from it. This by the way, it turns out that positing the sign is inseparable from analysis that the sign is the result of the analysis, without which he could not appear. The sign also appears and the tool analysis, since once defined and isolated it can be correlated with new experiences, playing on to them the role of the analytical grid.
The second variable of the sign: the form of his connection with what he
ReplyDeletemeans. Through the action of pregnancty, rivalry and
especially liking the similarity in the sixteenth century conquered the space
and time, as the role of the sign consisted in the connection and binding
things. On the contrary, classicism is characterized by its sign
sushestvenno variance. The cyclical world of convergent characters
substituted endless deployment. In this space sign
can take two positions: either he as part
is part of explanation of what it is or it
really and truly separated from it. In truth, this
the alternative is not radical, as a sign to
to function, and have simultaneously implemented in the signified,
and different from him. Indeed, in order for the sign was
mark, it is necessary that it was given to consciousness, however, that he
means. As Condillac observes, the sound would never
child verbal sign things if he would, at least
again, was not heard at the moment of perception of this thing<$F
Condillac. Essai sur l'origine des connaissances humaines
(Euvres, Paris, 1798, t. I, p. 188--208).>.Ho to
the element of perception could become familiar enough to
was part of it; you have to select it as
element and delivered from the General impression with which he
implicitly linked; therefore, you need to make this impression
was dismembered to the attention focused on one of the
interwoven with other moment to this point is included in
part of the common experience, were isolated from it. This
by the way, it turns out that positing the sign is inseparable from
analysis that the sign is the result of the analysis, without which
he could not appear. The sign also appears and the tool
analysis, since once defined and isolated it
can be correlated with new experiences, playing on
to them the role of the analytical grid.