After the publication of the above article I received from Dr. downs (Dowries) a reprint of the article "On the influence of light on protoplasm" (On the influence of Light on Protoplasm), which was written by him and T. R. Ohm Blunt'M. A. and communicated to the Royal society in 1879 This article was a continuation of his previous article, which, referring mainly bacteria, argued that:
"light prevents the development of these organisms, and under favorable conditions can absolutely stop him."
This additional article proves that the above harmful the effect of light is obtained only when cash is oxygen. Taking first a comparatively simple type of molecule that is part of the organic matter the authors, on the basis of detailed experiments, they say:
"So, obviously, that oxygen was the destructive agent under the influence of sunlight". A description of the experiments on small organisms is accompanied by the conclusion:
"So it seemed that in the absence of the atmosphere the light was not at able to produce any appreciable effect on such organisms, as for their appearance".
After the publication of the above article I received from Dr. downs
ReplyDelete(Dowries) a reprint of the article "On the influence of light on protoplasm" (On the influence
of Light on Protoplasm), which was written by him and T. R. Ohm Blunt'M. A. and
communicated to the Royal society in 1879
This article was a continuation of his previous article, which, referring
mainly bacteria, argued that:
"light prevents the development of these organisms, and under favorable
conditions can absolutely stop him."
This additional article proves that the above harmful
the effect of light is obtained only when cash is oxygen. Taking first
a comparatively simple type of molecule that is part of the organic matter
the authors, on the basis of detailed experiments, they say:
"So, obviously, that oxygen was the destructive agent under
the influence of sunlight".
A description of the experiments on small organisms is accompanied by the conclusion:
"So it seemed that in the absence of the atmosphere the light was not at
able to produce any appreciable effect on such organisms,
as for their appearance".