But in reality, the way down is done only in order to restore the shining surface that was hidden and buried. That is, if the interpreter has to move deeper in your "digging up" the movement of interpretation is a kind of exaltation, aiming for the top, it does spread underneath the depth more and more visible. Depth now appears solely as a mystery surface, and thus the flight of an eagle, climbing the mountain - all this the verticality, which is so important in "Zarathustra" is, strictly speaking, reversion of depth, the discovery that it is nothing like the game or the fold surface. The deeper world is the look, the obvious it becomes that all of that was considered the depth of the man, there is just a childish game. I ask the question: is it possible - with all the obvious differences - compare this spatiality [spatialite], this game, which Nietzsche leads the notion of depth with the game, which leads Marx to the concept of "plane" [=banality, platitude]. This concept is very important for Marx; in the beginning "Capital" he shows how, unlike Perseus, he must plunge in the fog, to show that in fact for him there are no monsters no deep mysteries, and all the depth behind created the bourgeoisie the concepts of money, capital, value is only "the plane".
But in reality, the way down is done only in order
ReplyDeleteto restore the shining surface that was hidden and
buried. That is, if the interpreter has to move deeper in your
"digging up" the movement of interpretation is a kind of exaltation,
aiming for the top, it does spread underneath the depth more and
more visible. Depth now appears solely as a mystery
surface, and thus the flight of an eagle, climbing the mountain - all this
the verticality, which is so important in "Zarathustra" is, strictly speaking,
reversion of depth, the discovery that it is nothing like the game or
the fold surface. The deeper world is the look, the
obvious it becomes that all of that was considered the depth of the man, there is just
a childish game.
I ask the question: is it possible - with all the obvious differences - compare
this spatiality [spatialite], this game, which Nietzsche leads
the notion of depth with the game, which leads Marx to the concept of "plane"
[=banality, platitude]. This concept is very important for Marx; in the beginning
"Capital" he shows how, unlike Perseus, he must plunge
in the fog, to show that in fact for him there are no monsters
no deep mysteries, and all the depth behind created
the bourgeoisie the concepts of money, capital, value is only
"the plane".